1988
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4616/14/6/022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The origin of the hump in the Cerenkov lateral distribution in gamma-ray showers and a possible means of separating them from proton showers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
17
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the lateral distribution ofČerenkov photons has been known to change with the altitude of the observation level. The core distance at which the hump appears as well as the prominence of the hump will be smaller with increasing altitude of observation [37,38]. Since theČerenkov front is being intercepted at different observation levels during its propagation in the atmosphere, the shower parameters like the average arrival angle, time etc also will be different at different observation levels.…”
Section: Altitude Dependence Of Quality Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the lateral distribution ofČerenkov photons has been known to change with the altitude of the observation level. The core distance at which the hump appears as well as the prominence of the hump will be smaller with increasing altitude of observation [37,38]. Since theČerenkov front is being intercepted at different observation levels during its propagation in the atmosphere, the shower parameters like the average arrival angle, time etc also will be different at different observation levels.…”
Section: Altitude Dependence Of Quality Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation studies in the past (Rao & Sinha, 1988;Hillas & Patterson, 1987;Zatsepin & Chudakov, 1962) have shown that the Čerenkov pool at the observation level has the signature of the primary. The lateral distribution of Čerenkov radiation seems to be distinctly different in γ− ray and proton initiated showers in the sense that in the former case it is flat upto about 140 m and characterized by an increased photon density (called the 'hump') at that distance while in the latter case it is steeper with practically no hump.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lateral distribution of Čerenkov radiation seems to be distinctly different in γ− ray and proton initiated showers in the sense that in the former case it is flat upto about 140 m and characterized by an increased photon density (called the 'hump') at that distance while in the latter case it is steeper with practically no hump. It has been suggested (Rao & Sinha, 1988) that this characteristic difference could be measured in an observation and could be used for improving the signal to noise ratio. These arguments are based on the average properties of showers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cherenkov condition can be converted in a kinetic energy threshold for particles with rest mass m 0 : Note that in air n ≈ 1 can be expressed as n = 1 + η [Rao88] and thus the threshold scales with the mass of the particles. Since the lightest particles involved in EAS are electrons and positrons, they have by far the lowest Cherenkov threshold (at sea level: E min = 4.6 GeV, E p min = 40 GeV, and E e min = 22 MeV, respectively [Rao88]). The interplay of the electron Cherenkov threshold and the number of electrons in the shower (cf.…”
Section: Cherenkov Light Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After crossing the so-called Cherenkov hump, the distribution levels off at larger distances, because light produced in the shower halo is predominantly sampled there. The hump itself is a geometrical feature that comes about by the changing refractive index of the atmosphere and the changing Cherenkov light emission angle [Rao88], leading to a focusing effect. The photon density inside the Cherenkov light pool as a function of the energy of the primary particle is given for different particle types in fig.…”
Section: Production and Attenuation Of Cherenkov Light In The Atmospherementioning
confidence: 99%