2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2009.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The origin of peroxisomes: The possibility of an actinobacterial symbiosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, it already had mitochondria, peroxisomes and an extremely versatile, complex metabolism including highly efficient ATP generation by oxidative processes [12]. The peroxisome, long thought to be another endosymbiosis remnant [29], was shown to be a eukaryotic invention [30,31], though endosymbiotic origins are still defended [32]. However, further analysis (also of the targeting of peroxisomal membrane proteins) convincingly establishes the peroxisome as a eukaryotic invention [33][34][35].…”
Section: Experimental Support For the Kinetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, it already had mitochondria, peroxisomes and an extremely versatile, complex metabolism including highly efficient ATP generation by oxidative processes [12]. The peroxisome, long thought to be another endosymbiosis remnant [29], was shown to be a eukaryotic invention [30,31], though endosymbiotic origins are still defended [32]. However, further analysis (also of the targeting of peroxisomal membrane proteins) convincingly establishes the peroxisome as a eukaryotic invention [33][34][35].…”
Section: Experimental Support For the Kinetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Kishino-Hasegawa-Templeton test (Templeton, 1983;Kishino and Hasegawa, 1989), as implemented in PHYLIP (Felsenstein, 1993), was used to determine whether there are significant differences in likelihood between the topology presented by Duhita et al (2010)) and an alternative one in which Pex proteins were monophyletic with ER proteins. In both cases the branch lengths were optimized using a JTT model for proteins (the model implemented in PHYLIP for that test).…”
Section: Topological Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum Likelihood analyses as implemented in PhyML v3.0 (Guindon and Gascuel, 2003) were performed on the clustalW alignment used by Duhita et al (2010)), using four different protein evolutionary models: JTT, WAG, VT and LG. In addition, to assess the possible effect of alignment uncertainty in the topology (Wong et al, 2008), we re-aligned the sequences using muscle v3.7 (Edgar, 2004) and trimmed them with the -gappyout option of trimAl v1.2.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations