2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2009.07.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The origin of nucleation and development of porous nanostructure of anodic alumina films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, for the oxide density ρ in Eqs. (2.24) and (2.25), although it was recently reported that ρ was different at the o/e and m/o interfaces [12,13], it is not clear whether and how the oxide density varies along each interface, and for simplicity's sake a constant oxide density 3.118 g cm −3 is used, which is in the range of experimental values [7,14]. Position-dependent oxide density along each interface can be adopted easily in the present model when the exact relation is clear in the future.…”
Section: Simulation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, for the oxide density ρ in Eqs. (2.24) and (2.25), although it was recently reported that ρ was different at the o/e and m/o interfaces [12,13], it is not clear whether and how the oxide density varies along each interface, and for simplicity's sake a constant oxide density 3.118 g cm −3 is used, which is in the range of experimental values [7,14]. Position-dependent oxide density along each interface can be adopted easily in the present model when the exact relation is clear in the future.…”
Section: Simulation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Here, we assume that ion migration across the oxide/electrolyte interface is the rate-determining step, because the oxygen and aluminum ions are weakly bound under the effect of the high electric field [94]. It should be noted that ionic migration in the bulk oxide has been proposed previously as an alternative rate-determining step [153], but recent experiments revealed that an increase in the acid concentration of the electrolyte, which should play a role directly at the oxide/electrolyte interface, can influence the anodization process significantly, such as increasing the pore diameter [98], the current density [154], and the oxide growth rate [99]. These profound changes of the anodization process should be due to changes in the anodization conditions at the oxide/electrolyte interface, and this is the basis of the present assumption that the rate-determining step is at this interface.…”
Section: Electric Potential Distribution Within Aaomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the flourishing picture of applications of anodic porous alumina in various fields, the formation mechanism of anodic porous alumina has been continuously investigated and under debate for more than six decades [1,96,, i.e., from Edwards and Keller [145,146] [147][148][149] in the 1970-1980s, Parkhutik and Shershulsky [130], Golovin et al [132][133][134], Jessensky et al [137,150], Li et al [99,138], in the 1990s, Patermarakis et al [135,136,[151][152][153][154], Garcia-Vergara et al [155][156][157][158][159][160] in the 2000-2010s, and most recently Hebert and Houser [139][140][141][142][143] in 2012. However, contradictory viewpoints still exist and no generally accepted theory has been established.…”
Section: Formation Mechanisms Of Anodic Porous Aluminamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the pioneering work in 1950s by Keller [102], Dewald [204,205], Vermilyea [206,207], and Cabrera and Mott [163], several groups have carried out further theoretical work, including the Wood and Thompson group in Manchester [2,95,96,118,128,155,156,208], the Gösele group in Max-Plank-Institute [99,137,138,150,178], the Patermarakis group in Greece [135,136,[151][152][153][154], the Parkhutik group in Minsk [130,209], the Golovin group in Northwestern [132][133][134], and the Hebert group in Iowa State [139][140][141][142][143]. Systematical elucidation of the theory in mathematical forms began from work done by the Parkhutik group [130] in 1992, and numerical simulation was started by the Golovin [133] and Hebert [139] groups in 2006.…”
Section: Objectives and Flow Of The Present Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%