The Origin of Land Plants: Some Answers, More Questions

Abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT) is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Taxon. SummaryThe discovery of new fossil plant remains, together with new interpretations of previously described forms, suggests that some ideas regarding the origin of land plants need to be modified. Some evidence suggests that perhaps plants with a bryophytic level of organization were on the land as early as the Ordovician. This suggestion is strengthened by a number of Devonian plants that lack tracheids despite possessing a suite of morphological features generally attributed to vascular plants. Such information necessitates that the current classification of early land plants be re-examined, together with ideas about the origin and subsequent evolution of vascular plants and bryophytes. IntroductionOne of the most interesting and intriguing topics in paleobiology today centers on the origin of a terrestrial flora (e.g., Gensel and Andrews, 1987). Since the first plants that possessed conducting cells in the form of tracheids were found in Devonian sediments, speculation has continued regarding possible land plant progenitors and the many ancillary questions associated with these speculations. It is perhaps safe to say that today there are nearly as many points of view on stages and events in the colonization of the land surface by plants as there are researchers speculating on the steps involved. What is perhaps most important, however, is the fact that the questions associated with "the first land plants" and where they came from are today being approached from many different perspectives. In recent years there has been a rather decided shift in many areas of paleobiology to the incorporation of a more biological perspective, while at the same time the realization has grown that the solution to many problems in plant evolution requires far more than a cursory understanding of the earth sciences. Approaches that are being used today range from analyzing chloroplast 4.5S and 5S rRNA sequences (e.g., Hori et al., 1985;Bobrova et al., 1987) to the incorporation of cladistic analyses as a method to visualize more clearly land plant ancestors and the points of separation of major groups (e.g., Mishler andChurchill, 1984, 1985;Sluiman, 1985). Others have utilized information about the size of vascular elements, thickness of cuticle, size and frequency of stomata and available surface area to hypothesize levels of physiological adaptation during the evolution of land plants (e.g., Raven, 1977Raven, , 1984. In another line of investigation, Chapman (1985) suggests that 02 had to reach a particular level for the synthesis of lignin, ultimately involved in the...

A Land-Plant-Specific Glycerol-3-Phosphate Acyltransferase Family in Arabidopsis: Substrate Specificity, sn-2 Preference, and Evolution

“…Cuticle evolution would be critical during this landmark transition from aquatic to terrestrial habitats (Riederer, 2006). Indeed, there is fossil evidence (Taylor, 1988) and both chemical and/or anatomical evidence of a cuticle in the earliest nonvascular land plants, including Sphagnum species, Physcomitrella patens (mosses; Cook and Graham, 1998), and Asterella species (liverworts; Caldicott and Eglinton, 1976). This early association to the sn-2-GPAT family is clearly observed at the molecular genetic level by the appearance of strong homologs (E , 10 2100 ) to sn-2-specific GPATs in the genomes of P. patens and the lycopod Selaginella moellendorffii.…”

EARLY EVOLUTION OF LAND PLANTS: Phylogeny, Physiology, and Ecology of the Primary Terrestrial Radiation

“…Less parsimonious hypotheses recognize bryophyte monophyly and either a sister group relationship with vascular plants (66) or an origin from within basal vascular plants (32,48,62,132). Phylogenetic evidence suggests that "bryophytes"' in general, and liverwort-like plants in particular, should have been important components of early terrestrial floras (67).…”

“…6,21,40,57,69,70,90,95,117,124,132) have either explicitly or implicitly identified one or more key innovations as crucial to the success of a particular taxonomic group. A bona fide key innovation should be a synapomorphy that was acquired immediately prior to an equally bona fide evolutionary radiation and can be shown to have been a far greater stimulus to that radiation than any other synapomorphies acquired on the same phylogenetic branch.…”

“…Within paleobotany, there are few more popular review topics than the origin and initial radiation of vascular land plants in the Silurian (438^10 mya) and Devonian (410-355 mya) periods (20,21,23,25,34,37,39,40,51,56,57,66,67,70,95,97,132). Fortunately, each crop of reviews is separated by remarkable empirical and conceptual advances in a wide range of fields that amply justify frequent reappraisals.…”

Plastid Origin and Evolution

“…1.5 billion years ago (Yoon et al, 2004) and finally by the rise of plants ca. 500 million years ago (Taylor, 1988).…”