2010
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Origin of Intraspecific Variation of Virulence in an Eukaryotic Immune Suppressive Parasite

Abstract: Occurrence of intraspecific variation in parasite virulence, a prerequisite for coevolution of hosts and parasites, has largely been reported. However, surprisingly little is known of the molecular bases of this variation in eukaryotic parasites, with the exception of the antigenic variation used by immune-evading parasites of mammals. The present work aims to address this question in immune suppressive eukaryotic parasites. In Leptopilina boulardi, a parasitic wasp of Drosophila melanogaster, well-defined vir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that SOD3 is not used as a virulence factor by L. heterotoma as it is by L. boulardi, thus evidencing interspecific variation in venom toxins in Leptopilina parasitoids despite phylogenetic proximity and the use of similar hosts. We recently showed that the quantitative difference in the LbGAP venom toxin was at the origin of the intraspecific variation of virulence between L. boulardi ISm and ISy lines (12). No such variation was found for SOD3 proteins neither in sequence or in venom quantity and activity, which seems to preclude a role of SODs in intraspecific variation of L. boulardi virulence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that SOD3 is not used as a virulence factor by L. heterotoma as it is by L. boulardi, thus evidencing interspecific variation in venom toxins in Leptopilina parasitoids despite phylogenetic proximity and the use of similar hosts. We recently showed that the quantitative difference in the LbGAP venom toxin was at the origin of the intraspecific variation of virulence between L. boulardi ISm and ISy lines (12). No such variation was found for SOD3 proteins neither in sequence or in venom quantity and activity, which seems to preclude a role of SODs in intraspecific variation of L. boulardi virulence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…11). The venom of ISm females, a highly virulent strain against Drosophila melanogaster, contains a RhoGAP protein that is required for parasitism success (12). This factor targets Drosophila lamellocytes, the main capsule-forming hemocytes, and induces changes in their morphology by inactivating the RhoGTPases Rac1 and Rac2, both required for successful encapsulation (13)(14)(15)(16)(17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While L. boulardi -17 infection affects the expression of more than 400 genes, only a small subset are differentially regulated after L. heterotoma -14 attack. This analysis and other inter-specific comparisons suggest that host-parasite resistance-virulence success interdependencies correlate to wasp venom compositions [11*,12*,53]. Intra-specific comparisons indicate that L. boulardi ( Lb ) strains differ in the expression of LbGAP alleles.…”
Section: Hybrid “Omics” Approaches Predict Molecular Virulence Effectorsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Intra-specific comparisons indicate that L. boulardi ( Lb ) strains differ in the expression of LbGAP alleles. LbGAP encodes a RhoGAP domain-containing venom protein that significantly affects host hemocyte shapes and function [11*,53,54]. Lbm , the more widely successful strain of Lb , expresses higher levels of LbGAP RNA than the less successful strain Lby , suggesting allelic differences in cis-regulation as the basis for variation in virulence [53].…”
Section: Hybrid “Omics” Approaches Predict Molecular Virulence Effectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the loss and gain of host resistance or parasitoid counter-resistance do not necessarily require extensive genetic changes but occur with simple genetic changes. For example, the cellular encapsulation responses of Drosophila melanogaster against Leptopilina clavipes eggs is controlled by some proteins in the N-glycosylation pathway (Mortimer et al 2012), and virulence/avirulence of a parasitoid L. boulardi against D. melanogaster was dependent on the expression level of a immune suppressive protein in venom (Colinet et al 2007(Colinet et al , 2010. These proteins would play key roles in the resistance and virulence mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%