Shifts and Patterns in Maltese 2016
DOI: 10.1515/9783110496376-007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The origin of differential object marking in Maltese

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thomason 2001). Döhla (2016), for instance, evaluates the plausibility that differential object marking in Maltese (Semitic) has been borrowed from Sicilian (Romance) and uses several other Semitic languages to assess a likely scenario. If historical data is unavailable, historical‐comparative reconstructions from closely related languages of L i may be used: potential outcomes of contact can then be compared to the reconstructions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thomason 2001). Döhla (2016), for instance, evaluates the plausibility that differential object marking in Maltese (Semitic) has been borrowed from Sicilian (Romance) and uses several other Semitic languages to assess a likely scenario. If historical data is unavailable, historical‐comparative reconstructions from closely related languages of L i may be used: potential outcomes of contact can then be compared to the reconstructions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%