1990
DOI: 10.1144/pygs.48.1.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The origin and significance of the distribution of shelly macrofauna in late Dinantian carbonate mud mounds of Derbyshire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present-day dip of exposed bedding reflects that of the original flank slopes of the mud mound at progressive growth stages. Concentrations of brachiopods hosted in scour features occur on the sides of the mud mounds (Gutteridge 1990), but these are distinct from the brachiopod shell beds discussed within this paper, which are observed onlapping or overlying the mounds. It is most likely that the relationship of the whole-fossil packstone beds with the mud mounds resulted from the local palaeogeography with the mound topography enabling shallow lagoons to form around 5).…”
Section: Stratigraphy and Lithofaciesmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The present-day dip of exposed bedding reflects that of the original flank slopes of the mud mound at progressive growth stages. Concentrations of brachiopods hosted in scour features occur on the sides of the mud mounds (Gutteridge 1990), but these are distinct from the brachiopod shell beds discussed within this paper, which are observed onlapping or overlying the mounds. It is most likely that the relationship of the whole-fossil packstone beds with the mud mounds resulted from the local palaeogeography with the mound topography enabling shallow lagoons to form around 5).…”
Section: Stratigraphy and Lithofaciesmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Carbonate mounds are highly characteristic of the Viséan (Nichols, 1961(Nichols, , 1965Bancroft et al, 1988;Horbury, 1992;Gutteridge, 1990;Gutteridge, 1995;Somerville, 2003). They most closely resemble the Type 2 mounds of Somerville (2003), interpreted to accrete from a crinoid -bryozoan -brachiopod core with abundant cemented micro-peloidal micrite such that structural support by organisms was short lived, and the mound was rapidly cemented.…”
Section: Platform Margin Depositional Environmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This study demonstrates that brachiopods are common skeletal components in all lithofacies of the mud mound complex at Ricklow, even in the automicrite-rich ones (L7, L9). The centimetre-to decimetre-size lenses of L8 with a richer brachiopod content in the mud mound complex core (LA2) might correspond to those interpreted by Gutteridge (1990) as "storm-scoured pockets" colonised by brachiopods. Gutteridge (1990) based this interpretation on the sharp edges of the pockets truncating structures in the mud mound complex core, concentration of pockets towards the top of the mud mound complex core, and marked asymmetry of their bases.…”
Section: Brachiopod Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this study is the reassessment of the depositional lithofacies and brachiopod fauna distribution in brachiopod-rich mud mounds from the upper Visean of the Derbyshire Carbonate Platform, UK (Gutteridge 1990(Gutteridge , 1995, according to Gutteridge (1990) brachiopods in the Derbyshire mud mounds are restricted to "storm-scoured" pockets in the mud mound surface. The final aim is to reach a better understanding of the palaeoenvironment and depositional model of the Derbyshire mud mounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%