2015
DOI: 10.2110/palo.2014.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Origin and Paleoecology of Clypeasteroid Assemblages From Different Shelf Settings of the Miocene of Sardinia, Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of morphological features and comparison with recent analogues (see discussion in Mancosu and Nebelsick, 2015, 2016, 2017b), the Clypeaster olisiponensis morphotype, with a highly domed test with thick and tumid margins and flat oral surface, and the Clypeaster latirostris morphotype, with a lower test and relatively thin margin, are interpreted as epibenthic and semi- to shallow infaunal forms, respectively. These morphotypes occur frequently in the Miocene sedimentary deposits of shallow-water settings (see Mancosu and Nebelsick, 2015, 2016, 2017b and discussion therein). The Clypeaster marginatus morphotype with a low, flattened test and thin margins, is interpreted as a shallowly buried to partially burrowed form.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the basis of morphological features and comparison with recent analogues (see discussion in Mancosu and Nebelsick, 2015, 2016, 2017b), the Clypeaster olisiponensis morphotype, with a highly domed test with thick and tumid margins and flat oral surface, and the Clypeaster latirostris morphotype, with a lower test and relatively thin margin, are interpreted as epibenthic and semi- to shallow infaunal forms, respectively. These morphotypes occur frequently in the Miocene sedimentary deposits of shallow-water settings (see Mancosu and Nebelsick, 2015, 2016, 2017b and discussion therein). The Clypeaster marginatus morphotype with a low, flattened test and thin margins, is interpreted as a shallowly buried to partially burrowed form.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The Clypeaster marginatus morphotype with a low, flattened test and thin margins, is interpreted as a shallowly buried to partially burrowed form. It is common as a minor component in spatangoid-dominated assemblages of moderately deep sublittoral environments (Mancosu and Nebelsick, 2015, 2017b, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19][20]). The skeletons of this echinoid group are common and often well-preserved in both recent environments and the fossil sedimentary record [11,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], which is indicative for a structurally resilient skeletal architecture [20]. The minute Echinocyamus pusillus represents a particular case within the clypeasteroid echinoids as collagenous fibres between the plates are entirely absent [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La replicabilidad de los métodos utilizados en Tafonomía es aún desconocida, aunque la utilización de atributos tafonómicos esté ampliamente reconocida en la actualidad (de forma no estandarizada) para diversos grupos de organismos, como los vertebrados (Araújo-Junior et al, 2015), equinoideos (Mancosu & Nebelsick, 2015), gasterópodos (Pisano et al, 2015), bivalvos (Erthal et al, 2015) y foraminíferos (Berkeley et al, 2009), entre otros.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified