2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17046.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The orbital period and system parameters of the recurrent nova T Pyx

Abstract: T Pyx is a luminous recurrent nova that accretes at a much higher rate than is expected for its photometrically determined orbital period of about 1.8 h. We here provide the first spectroscopic confirmation of the orbital period, P = 1.8295 h (f = 13.118368 ± 1.1 × 10 −5 c d −1 ), based on time-resolved optical spectroscopy obtained at the Very Large Telescope and the Magellan telescope. We also derive an upper limit of the velocity semi-amplitude of the white dwarf, K1 = 17.9 ± 1.6 km s −1 , and estimate a ma… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
87
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
87
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2 In their orbital solution of T Pyx using the He II 4686 Å emission line during quiescence, Uthas et al (2010) were unable to derive a definitive systematic velocity for the nova but all of their solutions were at a velocity lower than +20 km s −1 . We suggest that there may be a residual uncertainty caused by the profile of the He II line and/or shell emission that compromises the center-of-mass velocity but not the amplitude of the variations, 17.9 ± 1.6 km s −1 .…”
Section: Distance and Extinction Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 In their orbital solution of T Pyx using the He II 4686 Å emission line during quiescence, Uthas et al (2010) were unable to derive a definitive systematic velocity for the nova but all of their solutions were at a velocity lower than +20 km s −1 . We suggest that there may be a residual uncertainty caused by the profile of the He II line and/or shell emission that compromises the center-of-mass velocity but not the amplitude of the variations, 17.9 ± 1.6 km s −1 .…”
Section: Distance and Extinction Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the Galactic rotation curve for the third quadrant (Brand & Blitz 1993) we find a minimum distance consistent with previous estimates, 4.0 kpc, for Θ 0 = 220 km s −1 based on the radial velocity v rad of the interstellar CH 4300 Å line. The center of mass velocity of the binary is still uncertain and may be variable (Uthas et al 2010) but there may be another way of obtaining it. In the JD 55 712 spectrum, the emission lines (e.g., Fe II RMT 42, H Balmer) show two nearly symmetric emission peaks, and the same holds for the weak emergent [O I] 5577, 6300 Å emission lines with a separation of about 700 km s −1 and mean velocity of +60 ± 3 km s −1 2 .…”
Section: Distance and Extinction Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They find that after day 28 the AMBER K-band and PIONIER-H band visibilities are consistent with a two-component bipolar plus central point source model with very low inclination. In light of the uncertainties in the orbital inclination from Uthas et al (2010), we set our constraints based on the interferometry.…”
Section: Modeling the Structure Of The Ejectamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a nonmagnetic CV, the virial temperature in the inner parts of the accretion disk (kT virial = μm p GM WD /3R WD ) is kT virial = 20−29 keV for a 0.7−1.0 M WD (WD mass is from Uthas et al 2010;and Toffelmeier et al 2013). The X-ray temperatures in Table 1 show that the flow is already virialized.…”
Section: The Chandra Spectrum Of the Total Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%