Observing and Measuring Visual Double Stars
DOI: 10.1007/1-85233-860-1_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Orbital Elements of a Visual Binary Star

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is surprising since those two orbits are recent. Alzner (2008) also reported position angle and separation values similar to ours, for the same epoch (2007.3). Mason's orbits clearly need to be revised.…”
Section: Astrometric Measurementssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This is surprising since those two orbits are recent. Alzner (2008) also reported position angle and separation values similar to ours, for the same epoch (2007.3). Mason's orbits clearly need to be revised.…”
Section: Astrometric Measurementssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…On the contrary, we did not resolve ADS 14783 although the expected separation is 0.38 arcsec, which is large enough to be detected, if the orbit proposed by Söderhjelm (1999) is valid. Note that this discrepancy has been confirmed by Alzner (2005) who also found this star single with a 32.5‐cm aperture, in 2004. Clearly, more observations are needed for this object.…”
Section: Astrometric Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“… Notes . (a): in 2010.0646 (2753 and 0.326 arcsec; unpublished measurement), we could resolve it with the same instrumental setup as used in this work; (b): at the limit of the instrumentation; (c): angular separation smaller than the diffraction limit; (d): at the moment of observation, the ephemerides for the orbit of Cvetkovic (2010) are 1518 and 0.20 arcsec; (e): not resolved by Couteau (1988) and Alzner (2003, 2005, 2008); (f): it should be resolved with the instrument used; and (g): ephemerides from the orbit of Zulevic (1984) give 3461 and 0.239 arcsec (2009.9082). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%