The OPTION scale for the assessment of shared decision making (SDM): methodological issues

Nicolai, Jennifer; Moshagen, Morten; Eich, Wolfgang; Bieber, Christiane

doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2012.03.002

Cited by 26 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 48 publications

(64 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The meetings were not audio-taped, and an live observer rated the encounter [38]. Previous research reported that audio recordings seem to reduce identification of SDM behaviors compared to videos/observations [39,40]. Therefore, we are confident that our scores were not inflated due to the rating method.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Occupational therapists’ shared decision-making behaviors with patients having persistent pain in a work rehabilitation context: A cross-sectional study

Coutu

Stacey

Durand

et al. 2015

Patient Education and Counseling

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Occupational therapists’ shared decision-making behaviors with patients having persistent pain in a work rehabilitation context: A cross-sectional study

Coutu

Stacey

Durand

et al. 2015

Patient Education and Counseling

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Second, inter-rater reliabilities may be overestimated because items are non-independent, and finally, most studies have not evaluated the validity of this scale. [18].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinicians’ Involvement of Patients in Decision Making. A Video Based Comparison of Their Behavior in Public vs. Private Practice

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundLittle is known about the extent to which Peruvian physicians seek to involve patients in shared decision making, or about the variation in these efforts across different settings.ObjectiveTo measure the extent to which Peruvian clinicians involve their patients in decision making and to explore the differences between clinicians’ behavior in private vs. public practice.DesignVideographic analysis.Participants and SettingSeven academic physicians who provided care to patients in a public and a private setting participate in this study. All the encounters in both settings were filmed on one random day of February 2012. Approach: Two raters, working independently and in duplicate used the 12-item OPTION scale to quantify the extent of physician effort to involve patients in shared decision making (with 0 indicating no effort and 100 maximum possible effort) in 58 video recordings of usual clinical encounters in private and public practice.ResultsThe mean OPTION score was 14.3 (SD 7.0). Although the OPTION score in the private setting (mean 16.5, SD 7.3) was higher than in the public setting (mean 12.3 SD 6.1) this difference was not statistically significant (p = .09).ConclusionPeruvian academic physicians in this convenience sample barely sought to involve their patients in shared decision making. Additional studies are required to confirm these results which suggest that patient-centered care remains an unfulfilled promise and a source of inequity within and across the private and the public sectors in Peru.

show abstract

“…The next best alternative to MAPPIN'SDM, the expanded Dyadic OPTION system [19], does not comprise an observer scale assessing the SDM performance of the doctor-patient dyad. Moreover, it carries on most of the theoretical shortcomings of its unilateral predecessor [9,27]. Therefore, it would not have been reasonable to build SDM MASS based on components drawn from the OPTION system.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Of blind men and elephants: suggesting SDM-MASS as a compound measure for shared decision making integrating patient, physician and observer views

Geiger¹,

Kasper

2012

Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheit

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The OPTION scale for the assessment of shared decision making (SDM): methodological issues

Cited by 26 publications

References 48 publications

Occupational therapists’ shared decision-making behaviors with patients having persistent pain in a work rehabilitation context: A cross-sectional study

Occupational therapists’ shared decision-making behaviors with patients having persistent pain in a work rehabilitation context: A cross-sectional study

Clinicians’ Involvement of Patients in Decision Making. A Video Based Comparison of Their Behavior in Public vs. Private Practice

Of blind men and elephants: suggesting SDM-MASS as a compound measure for shared decision making integrating patient, physician and observer views

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About