2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The optimisation of shot peen forming processes

Abstract: An optimisation method based on an effective process model is presented. The calibrated and verified process model simulates peening on realistic components and provides a non-linear relationship between peening parameters and deflections. An optimal solution can be found by minimising the deviation of the computed deformed shape from the desired shape subject to certain constraints. This optimal solution of peening parameters can be directly used for practical operations. An optimisation example for forming a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…up to 50 m/s) frictionlessly and vertically on the target surface of a relatively large solid with isotropic strain-rate-insensitive elastic-plasticity. These assumptions are generally applicable to the practical operations of shot peening on aluminium alloy materials, which are discussed in detail in reference [3]. To study such a dynamic process of a single impact, an explicit dynamic finite element method is well suited.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Axisymmetric Single Impact Model With a Verymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…up to 50 m/s) frictionlessly and vertically on the target surface of a relatively large solid with isotropic strain-rate-insensitive elastic-plasticity. These assumptions are generally applicable to the practical operations of shot peening on aluminium alloy materials, which are discussed in detail in reference [3]. To study such a dynamic process of a single impact, an explicit dynamic finite element method is well suited.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Axisymmetric Single Impact Model With a Verymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is not strictly symmetric in reality, it is expected that this symmetric configuration may cause a small error because a large number of shot impacts are being modelled. Unlike that used by Wang and co-workers [3,10], a structured mesh is used with 3D continuum elements C3D8R. Although this eight-node hexahedral element requires a greater computational cost, it is more accurate than the four-node tetrahedral element.…”
Section: The Target Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1) is assumed to be distributed in a hemispherical cavity [13], the plastic depth h p produced from this contact pressure [14] can be given by:…”
Section: The Plastic Layer Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the 3D SP models can show the effect of SP coverage rate on residual stress distribution, they are approaching to the practical work more and become the main choice in recent years, especially 3D models with dynamic analysis. In the overview of SP simulation, some 3D models are adopted with different model descriptions, kinds of material models, kinds of analysis, number of shot balls, and so on [8,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. On these 3D models, most studies focus on homogeneous material and few work involves 3D inhomogeneous inclusions while establishing models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%