2002
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The OptiMARK clinical development program: Summary of safety data

Abstract: Purpose: To describe and summarize the safety data from the OptiMARK clinical development program. Materials and Methods:In the 18 clinical studies comprising the clinical program, doses ranging from 0.1 to 0.7 mmol/kg were administered to healthy adult volunteers, patients with hepatic or renal impairment, and patients with confirmed or highly suspected central nervous system (CNS), liver, breast, vascular, bone, or soft tissue pathologies. A total of 2038 injections of OptiMARK, Magnevist, or placebo were ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, no difference was detected in the QTc interval between different dose groups. This finding is consistent with those of previous studies in which the QTc interval did not differ between subjects administered either saline or gadoversetamide (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Third, no difference was detected in the QTc interval between different dose groups. This finding is consistent with those of previous studies in which the QTc interval did not differ between subjects administered either saline or gadoversetamide (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Of the 164 AEs reported in the combined population, only 8 (4.9%) were classified as likely to be related to gadoversetamide. This rate is slightly lower than that reported in past studies (7). Furthermore, only two of the eight that were likely related to gadoversetamide were considered to have any clinical significance and merit discussion.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Numerous studies have been performed comparing ProHance, Omniscan, and OptiMARK to Magnevist, and no significant differences have been found in the incidence of adverse reactions (10,13,(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). For example, the incidence of hives has been reported as ranging from 0.2% to Ͻ2%, these figures being statistically indistinguishable.…”
Section: Basic Pharmacologymentioning
confidence: 99%