1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02361.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The optical counterpart of SAX J1808.4 -- 3658, the transient bursting millisecond X-ray pulsar

Abstract: A set of CCD images have been obtained during the decline of the X‐ray transient SAX J1808.4 ‐ 3658 during 1998 April‐‐June. The optical counterpart has been confirmed by several pieces of evidence. The optical flux shows a modulation on several nights that is consistent with the established X‐ray binary orbit period of 2 h. This optical variability is roughly in antiphase with the weak X‐ray modulation. The source mean magnitude of V=16.7 on April 18 declined rapidly after April 22. From May 2 onwards the mag… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
61
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
13
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optical intensity of this source faded as the X-ray source declined, and a 2 hr orbital modulation was marginally detected in the optical flux (Giles, Hill, & Greenhill 1999). This 2 hr optical modu-lation was subsequently confirmed in observations during quiescence (Homer et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optical intensity of this source faded as the X-ray source declined, and a 2 hr orbital modulation was marginally detected in the optical flux (Giles, Hill, & Greenhill 1999). This 2 hr optical modu-lation was subsequently confirmed in observations during quiescence (Homer et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This is particularly evident in the JKT and Mount Canopus observations on MJD 50,921, which were spaced by half a day but differ by 0.2 mag in V and I. One possible contribution to this discrepancy is the 2 hr orbital flux modulation reported by Giles et al (1999), with an amplitude of Ӎ0.07 mag. To account for this in our fits, we added a systematic uncertainty of this size in quadrature to the statistical uncertainties quoted in Table 1.…”
Section: Observations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, with the significant exception of SAX J1808.4−3658 and IGR J00291+5934, their optical/NIR quiescent counterparts are only poorly known. The optical light curve of SAX J1808.4−3658 in outburst and quiescence shows variability modulated at the orbital period, in antiphase with the X-ray light curve (Giles et al 1999;Homer et al 2001;Campana et al 2004;Deloye et al 2008;Wang et al 2009). This is unlike other quiescent transients that normally show a double-humped morphology, due to an ellipsoidal modulation, and indicates that the companion star is exposed to some irradiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…If the persistent spectrum would have been similar to when the persistent flux was measured, the upper limit on the flux would be 3 × 10 −10 erg cm −2 s −1 (in 2-28 keV, for 10 4 s exposures). Figure 2 shows the error regions of all bursts with respect to that of the persistent emission and the optical counterpart (Giles et al 1998). There is no doubt that these bursts are from SAX J1808.4-3658.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%