2002
DOI: 10.1006/icar.2002.6923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Opposition Effect and Negative Polarization of Structural Analogs for Planetary Regoliths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
83
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
6
83
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing Lutetia polarimetric curve with laboratory powder of meteorites, only the carbonaceous chondrites, specially the CV3, show similar minimum of negative branch and inversion angle. Multiple hypothesis have been evoked to explain this phenomena (Shkuratov et al, 1994, for a review), but the shadow-hiding and coherent-backscattering seems to prevail as the main mechanisms (Shkuratov et al, 2002). The connection with such dark meteoritic composition should rule out the contribution of CBOE, since the mechanism is also connect to grain shape and size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When comparing Lutetia polarimetric curve with laboratory powder of meteorites, only the carbonaceous chondrites, specially the CV3, show similar minimum of negative branch and inversion angle. Multiple hypothesis have been evoked to explain this phenomena (Shkuratov et al, 1994, for a review), but the shadow-hiding and coherent-backscattering seems to prevail as the main mechanisms (Shkuratov et al, 2002). The connection with such dark meteoritic composition should rule out the contribution of CBOE, since the mechanism is also connect to grain shape and size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connection with such dark meteoritic composition should rule out the contribution of CBOE, since the mechanism is also connect to grain shape and size. Shkuratov et al (2002) states that scattering of higher orders still significantly contribute to negative polarization, even for very dark surfaces. Therefore, the wide negative branch of Lutetia may still be a product of both mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Muñoz et al 2000;Shkuratov et al 2002). The negative branch was found to become more prominent and the inversion angle to increase in the cases of a) an increase in the refractive index; b) a decrease in the particle sizes to sizes comparable wavelength; c) complex internal structure of particles; and d) the mixture of particles with high contrast in albedo (Muñoz et al 2000;Shkuratov et al 1994Shkuratov et al , 2002Zubko et al 2005). One or several of the abovementioned properties can be responsible for the particular polarization characteristics of Lutetia.…”
Section: Polarimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution of the mechanism of the single particle scattering remains poorly understood but its efficiency in producing wide negative polarization branch has been demonstrated by laboratory and numerical modeling (e.g. Muñoz et al 2000;Shkuratov et al 2002). The negative branch was found to become more prominent and the inversion angle to increase in the cases of a) an increase in the refractive index; b) a decrease in the particle sizes to sizes comparable wavelength; c) complex internal structure of particles; and d) the mixture of particles with high contrast in albedo (Muñoz et al 2000;Shkuratov et al 1994Shkuratov et al , 2002Zubko et al 2005).…”
Section: Polarimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%