The Opportunity Cost of Compulsory Research Participation: Why Psychology Departments Should Abolish Involuntary Participant Pools

Walker, Ruth

doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00232-2

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Researchers should also take measures to ensure that learner participation does not adversely affect their educational activities. 8 Ethical issues arise within data storage and analysis. Adhering to both institutional and national legal data protection regulations is an absolute requirement.…”

Section: Ethical Considerations Within Healthcare Professions Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In intervention‐based studies, randomization to intervention or control arms raises questions about how this may impact on learner education and experience, and requires careful justification. Researchers should also take measures to ensure that learner participation does not adversely affect their educational activities 8 …”

Section: Ethical Considerations Within Healthcare Professions Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Gaining ethics approval for health professions education research

Guckian

Thampy

2022

Clinical and Experimental Dermatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Within health professions education (HPE), there is a well‐established and expanding literature offering empirical evidence to inform pedagogic practice. Research ethics refers to the set of professional standards and principles that should be followed to ensure that work is conducted in a responsible and legitimate manner. Conducting scholarly inquiry within educational practice can be categorized as either research or evaluation, but boundaries between the two approaches may be blurred. Ethical risks in HPE research include coercion, psychological stress and infringement upon data privacy. This review considers ethical considerations at each stage of the research process and makes practical recommendations for the HPE researcher.

show abstract

Section: Ethical Considerations Within Healthcare Professions Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Ethical Considerations Within Healthcare Professions Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gaining ethics approval for health professions education research

Guckian

Thampy

2022

Clinical and Experimental Dermatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, a substantial amount of work in the social sciences relies on recruiting people who are nearby, ready, willing, and able to participate. When working in academic settings, researchers often rely on university "subject pools" or "participant pools" (e.g., students in undergraduate classes who participate in studies for course credit) (Gallander Wintre, North, & Sugar, 2001;Rocchi, Beaudry, Anderson, & Pelletier, 2016;Walker, 2020). In work with consumers, one might recruit customers shopping in nearby businesses.…”

Section: Sampling and Exclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing for Diversity: Inclusive Sampling

Roscoe

2021

edhci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Experts in human factors and ergonomics (HF/E) and related fields have the ability and responsibility to broadly serve the needs and goals of diverse people, which encompasses issues of inclusion, equity, and justice. Importantly, HF/E designers, researchers, and practitioners can address these aims both as the intended outcomes of their work and how the work itself is conducted. Both pathways support progress toward more inclusive and equitable organizations and societies. This paper focuses upon one aspect of inclusive methodology—strategies for inclusive sampling. Sampling is an important focus because of its fundamental role in defining the internal and external validity of findings. Moreover, sampling is how diverse participants and perspectives are incorporated (or not), and thus represents an early way that exclusion, inequity, or inaccessibility may manifest. Three heuristic questions and six sets of strategies are briefly articulated: (1) purposive sampling, (2) oversampling, (3) community sampling, (4) removing barriers of distance, cost, communication, and awareness, (5) building trust, and (6) inclusive demographic categories. A variety of sources are cited to facilitate readers’ further consideration of these issues in their own HF/E endeavors.

show abstract

Moving Forward: Research Funding and International and Interdisciplinary Group Research

Keyton¹

2021

The Emerald Handbook of Group and Team Communication Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Opportunity Cost of Compulsory Research Participation: Why Psychology Departments Should Abolish Involuntary Participant Pools

Cited by 3 publications

References 27 publications

Gaining ethics approval for health professions education research

Gaining ethics approval for health professions education research

Designing for Diversity: Inclusive Sampling

Moving Forward: Research Funding and International and Interdisciplinary Group Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About