2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The opportunities and challenges of multi-site evaluations: Lessons from the jail diversion and trauma recovery national cross-site evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, the study duration and set of evaluation resources have been extensive. Although distinct in these ways, the CEC can relate to common challenges with conducting multisite, multiprogram evaluations, including variability across sites in local contexts, intervention designs, evaluation approaches, data management, and site-level resources ( Lewis et al, 2009 ; Stainbrook et al, 2015 ). As noted in the literature, a high level of heterogeneity can make it challenging to standardize research protocols and generalize findings ( Constantine & Cagampang, 1998 ; Rog & Ponirakis, 2002 ; Stainbrook et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Appreciating the Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the study duration and set of evaluation resources have been extensive. Although distinct in these ways, the CEC can relate to common challenges with conducting multisite, multiprogram evaluations, including variability across sites in local contexts, intervention designs, evaluation approaches, data management, and site-level resources ( Lewis et al, 2009 ; Stainbrook et al, 2015 ). As noted in the literature, a high level of heterogeneity can make it challenging to standardize research protocols and generalize findings ( Constantine & Cagampang, 1998 ; Rog & Ponirakis, 2002 ; Stainbrook et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Appreciating the Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 It is important for service providers to recognize that these behaviors are not always characterological, but may have developed over time as adaptive strategies for coping with the impact of trauma. 45 This understanding can translate into more sensitive responses throughout the service delivery process. A hallmark of trauma-informed care is that each interaction is made with the intention of contributing to recovery and reducing the likelihood of re-traumatization.…”
Section: How Trauma-informed Principles Can Helpmentioning
confidence: 99%