1994
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450720610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The operating cost of electrocoagulation

Abstract: The electrocoagulation of kaolinite and bentonite suspensions was studied in a pilot electrocoagulation system at the Western Research Center of CANMET to assess the operating cost and efficiency of the process. Factors affecting the operating cost such as, the formation of passivation layers on electrode plates, flow velocity and concentration of sodium chloride in the suspension were examined. The operating costs investigated in this paper were the power cost of the electrocoagulation cell and the material c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
45
0
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This method is increasingly gaining popularity because of its environmental compatibility, high particulate removal efficiency, versatility, energy efficiency, safety, selectivity and amenability to automation, low amount sludge generating and cost effectiveness [5,[8][9][10][11]. EC has been proposed and adopted for the treatment of various wastewater such as wastewater containing food and protein wastes [12], textile wastewater [8,13], oil mill wastewater [14], urban wastewater [13], heavy metal laden wastewater [15], nitrite effluent [16], aqueous suspensions containing kaolinite, bentonite, and ultra fine particles [17,18], fluoride containing water [19], restaurant wastewater [20], textile dye solution [21,22], smelter wastewater containing arsenic [23], landfill leachate [24], saline wastewater [25], tar sand and oil shale wastewater [26], laundry wastewater [27], potable water [28], potato chips wastewater [10], poultry slaughterhouse wastewater [8], boron containing water [29], alcohol distillery wastewater [30], sulfide [31] etc. But in Bangladesh, most of the industry owner is not keen to operate effluent treatment plant (ETP) due to high operating cost and very few (like H.R.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is increasingly gaining popularity because of its environmental compatibility, high particulate removal efficiency, versatility, energy efficiency, safety, selectivity and amenability to automation, low amount sludge generating and cost effectiveness [5,[8][9][10][11]. EC has been proposed and adopted for the treatment of various wastewater such as wastewater containing food and protein wastes [12], textile wastewater [8,13], oil mill wastewater [14], urban wastewater [13], heavy metal laden wastewater [15], nitrite effluent [16], aqueous suspensions containing kaolinite, bentonite, and ultra fine particles [17,18], fluoride containing water [19], restaurant wastewater [20], textile dye solution [21,22], smelter wastewater containing arsenic [23], landfill leachate [24], saline wastewater [25], tar sand and oil shale wastewater [26], laundry wastewater [27], potable water [28], potato chips wastewater [10], poultry slaughterhouse wastewater [8], boron containing water [29], alcohol distillery wastewater [30], sulfide [31] etc. But in Bangladesh, most of the industry owner is not keen to operate effluent treatment plant (ETP) due to high operating cost and very few (like H.R.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the effect was less significant in the case of the Al electrode. It has been reported by several authors 25,31,32 that chloride ions are able to strongly promote anodic dissolution by avoiding inhibition phenomena at the surface of sacrificial anodes. In fact, during electrocoagulation the surface of the electrode is covered by an oxide layer that is continuously formed by water splitting at the solution/oxide interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The operating cost includes material (mainly electrodes) cost, electrical energy cost, as well as labor, maintenance and other costs. The latter cost items are largely independent of the electrode material (Kobya et al 2006b;Bayramoglu et al 2004;Donini et al 1994). Thus, in this study, the operating cost was calculated with electrodes and electrical energy costs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%