2011
DOI: 10.1353/scp.2011.0016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ontology of the Scholarly Journal and the Place of Peer Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is much debate in the academic world about the value of peer review and how to improve it (see Harley & Krzys Acord, 2011; Souder, 2011; Wheeler, 2011 for recent commentaries). Many studies have been published over the years showing that there is often little agreement between the independent referees about whether or not a paper should be published (eg.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is much debate in the academic world about the value of peer review and how to improve it (see Harley & Krzys Acord, 2011; Souder, 2011; Wheeler, 2011 for recent commentaries). Many studies have been published over the years showing that there is often little agreement between the independent referees about whether or not a paper should be published (eg.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, this information can be used by researchers to clarify the roles played by editors and publishers—roles also discussed in the previous literature, but not quite to the same extent as that of authors and referees (eg. but see Gould, 2011; Hames, 2007; Hirschauer, 2010; Lipworth & Kerridge, 2011; Miller & Perrucci, 2001; Schwartz & Zamboanga, 2009; Weller, 2011; Wheeler, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%