2014
DOI: 10.14257/ijunesst.2014.7.1.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ontology Design of Intangible Cultural Heritage Based on CIDOC CRM

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides CIDOC CRM, other cultural heritage models have been developed, such as the Pang Wang Festival Ontology [24], the Cultural Heritage Repository [25] and the Balinese Kulkul Ontology [26]. Sitthisarn et al [27] have developed an ontology for folk wisdom and intangible cultural heritage in Phatthalung Province.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides CIDOC CRM, other cultural heritage models have been developed, such as the Pang Wang Festival Ontology [24], the Cultural Heritage Repository [25] and the Balinese Kulkul Ontology [26]. Sitthisarn et al [27] have developed an ontology for folk wisdom and intangible cultural heritage in Phatthalung Province.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sitthisarn et al [27] have developed an ontology for folk wisdom and intangible cultural heritage in Phatthalung Province. The Pang Wang Festival Ontology focuses on social practices, rituals, and festive events [24]. The main aim of this ontology is to preserve traditional festival knowledge for future generations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its "CIDOC CRM provides definitions and formal descriptions for the implicit and explicit concepts, and their relationship involved in the work of the documentation information of cultural heritage, which reaches a common understanding of the information of cultural heritage through a general, extendable semantic framework so that the information communicated and the established information systems share a common language." [6] However, entities and properties defined by CIDOC CRM are written in English, and they are not appropriate for describing Korean cultural heritage. Especially in terms of the properties used in the ontology, the system is unnatural for our purposes because the passive form is not often used in the Korean language.…”
Section: Cidoc Crmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the construction of the ontology, analysis of information pertaining to cultural heritage is important in order to limit the scope of the construction of the domain ontology [6]. Figure 5, an example of Korean tea culture history, shows the construction of a 5-dimension ontology incorporating actionable information, time information, actor information, place information, and thing information.…”
Section: Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation