2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ontologization of Romani: An Italian study on the cross-categorization approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In Spain, the authors found that Roma people were attributed more natural (or animal-like) characteristics when participants were informed that Roma had not socially integrated despite the various efforts on the part of the majority to integrate them. Researchers have shown that more cultural characteristics are attributed to the ingroup than to the Roma, whereas more natural characteristics are assigned to the Roma than to the ingroup in Great Britain and Romania [4], and in Italy [10].…”
Section: The Ontologization Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In Spain, the authors found that Roma people were attributed more natural (or animal-like) characteristics when participants were informed that Roma had not socially integrated despite the various efforts on the part of the majority to integrate them. Researchers have shown that more cultural characteristics are attributed to the ingroup than to the Roma, whereas more natural characteristics are assigned to the Roma than to the ingroup in Great Britain and Romania [4], and in Italy [10].…”
Section: The Ontologization Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, the very same stimulus word was used to measure animalistic dehumanization and ontologization. For instance, Saminaden, Loughnan and Haslam [20] have used stimuli words such as polite, analytic, impulsive and simple, whereas Berti, Pivetti and Di Battista [10] used educated, instinctive and simple.…”
Section: Ontologization and Dehumanization: An Attempt For Reconciliamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From a different perspective, by elaborating a taxonomical analysis of the speech in political proposals, Santa Ana (2002in Cisneros, 2008; see also Santa Ana 1999), found that a), when the nation is explained by means of body-related language (i.e., a body), immigrants are a burden or physical pain, and b), when the metaphor represents a house, immigrants are an invasion, theft, or even dangerous flooding. Finally, a large amount of side effects can be reported as well, such as a higher attribution of animalistic characteristics (Berti, Pivetti, & Di Battista, 2013), a stronger implicit face association to machines, a weaker face association to human traits (Bain, Park, Kwok, & Haslam, 2009), and a bigger perception of barbarian and valueless human beings in refugees (Esses, Veenvliet, Hodson, & Mihic, 2008).…”
Section: New Forms Of Prejudice: Infrahumanizationmentioning
confidence: 99%