2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3565982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ontologies Community of Practice: An Initiative by the CGIAR Platform for Big Data in Agriculture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Being cognizant of such a broad range of options, our examination considers categories of data which may fit into a functional definition of DSI, namely: DNA, RNA, protein, genetic markers (with or without sequences), non-coding features and other data categories (Houssen et al, 2020;Brink et al, 2021) and specifically suggests ways to link these data to other ontologized knowledge to accommodate expansive views of DSI. As best practice, existing ontology may be used where each concept bears a unique and resolvable identifier, called a Uniform Resource Identifier, for which the definition, context of use and semantic relationships are validated by a large community (Arnaud et al, 2020). For example, the Sequence Ontology, the Protein Ontology, and the Gene Ontology, which include concepts and definitions of Genomic Objects along with other relevant ontologies, such as the NCBI taxonomy for species, and metadata standards, such as the Biosample record, may provide a useful point of departure.…”
Section: Global Policy On Access and Benefit-sharing And The Nexus Wi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being cognizant of such a broad range of options, our examination considers categories of data which may fit into a functional definition of DSI, namely: DNA, RNA, protein, genetic markers (with or without sequences), non-coding features and other data categories (Houssen et al, 2020;Brink et al, 2021) and specifically suggests ways to link these data to other ontologized knowledge to accommodate expansive views of DSI. As best practice, existing ontology may be used where each concept bears a unique and resolvable identifier, called a Uniform Resource Identifier, for which the definition, context of use and semantic relationships are validated by a large community (Arnaud et al, 2020). For example, the Sequence Ontology, the Protein Ontology, and the Gene Ontology, which include concepts and definitions of Genomic Objects along with other relevant ontologies, such as the NCBI taxonomy for species, and metadata standards, such as the Biosample record, may provide a useful point of departure.…”
Section: Global Policy On Access and Benefit-sharing And The Nexus Wi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in order to make given plant traits amenable to large-scale computational analysis, it is necessary to have suitable labels for the data clusters relevant to investigating such traits. This requires the development of reliable and standardised trait descriptors, which in turn involves consultations across breeders, farmers, researchers and consumers concerning which traits are most significant for investigation and which labels are most appropriate in defining thema fraught set of questions to ask within a cross-cultural, multilingual environment plagued by power differentials and inequity between the parties involved (Arnaud et al, 2020;Leonelli, 2022;Curry & Leonelli, 2022). Additionally, analysing data on phenomena ranging from ecological stressors to hostpathogen interactions requires having sufficient metadata about the conditions of origin and the legitimate range of possible uses of such data (Shaw et al, 2020); and linking data from many different sources (whether genomic and experimental data from public or corporate research, knowledge of plant strains and environments held by farmers and breeders, or data related to stored germplasm collections) requires sharing, access and reuse agreements among stakeholders as well as venues in which such agreements can be forged.…”
Section: Dimensions Of Responsible Plant Data Governancementioning
confidence: 99%