The Ongole Cattle Germplasm: Corollary Arising out of Regulating  Access, Associated Knowledge and Benefit Sharing Post  Nagoya Protocol by Brazil from India

Singh, Poonam Jayant; Tiwari, Atul Kumar

doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2016.511.022

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Indian CNA, the National Biodiversity Authority (NBA), decided to constitute an expert committee to take a decision on this matter. The question was, “Should NBA allow for as a South–South arrangement for exchange of germplasm, or may NBA impose restrictions and enter into a benefit sharing agreements and stop third party transfer of developed germplasm from Ongole germplasm?” [ 37 ]. In 2018, it was decided to grant permission for the transaction, and Onkole embryos were exported to Brazil [ 38 ].…”

Section: Angr In the International Trade: Examples From The Un Comtradementioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in Livestock Sector: What Have We Learnt So Far?

Martyniuk

Haska

2021

Animals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the paper was to analyze impacts of seven years of implementation of the Nagoya Protocol on the livestock sector based on available sources of information and literature. Interim National Reports on implementation of the Nagoya Protocol provided by countries and other information available at the ABS Clearing House managed by the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, especially Internationally Recognized Certificates of Compliance (IRCC), were analyzed. Moreover, trends in geneflow of breeding products in selected countries, based on the national reports provided to the UN COMATRADE database, have been compared. Analysis from these sources showed limited impact of the implementation of the Nagoya Protocol for livestock breeding and conservation, as out of 2370 IRCC issued by 31 May 2021, only 573 were granted for animal genetic/biological resources including 90 with livestock as the subject matter. Only one IRCC was granted to a foreign user; all other IRCC were issued for domestic users. The intent was to use livestock genetic/biological resources as bioresources for innovation, which should lead to establishment of the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) with benefits to be shared through the National Competent Authority or for research purposes.

show abstract

Section: Angr In the International Trade: Examples From The Un Comtradementioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in Livestock Sector: What Have We Learnt So Far?

Martyniuk

Haska

2021

Animals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Ongole Cattle Germplasm: Corollary Arising out of Regulating Access, Associated Knowledge and Benefit Sharing Post Nagoya Protocol by Brazil from India

Cited by 1 publication

References 7 publications

Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in Livestock Sector: What Have We Learnt So Far?

Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in Livestock Sector: What Have We Learnt So Far?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About