2001
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.01109785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay to screen compounds for in vivo estrogenic responses: phase 1.

Abstract: The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has completed the first phase of an international validation program for the rodent uterotrophic bioassay. This uterotrophic bioassay is intended to identify the in vivo activity of compounds that are suspected agonists or antagonists of estrogen. This information could, for example, be used to help prioritize positive compounds for further testing. Using draft protocols, we tested and compared two model systems, the immature female rat and the adult o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
55
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Wistar, Sprague-Dawley, Fischer 344, and Noble) and various endpoints were used, some strain differences in the response to treatment with environmental estrogens have been reported (Long et al 2000;Steinmetz et al 1998;McKim et al 2001). Yet, these and other published data (Odum et al 1999a(Odum et al , 1999bKanno et al 2001) do not indicate significant differences in uterine response among rat strains. Nonetheless, further data are needed to prove or disprove the existence of consistent differences in sensitivity among strains (Owens and Ashby 2002).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Wistar, Sprague-Dawley, Fischer 344, and Noble) and various endpoints were used, some strain differences in the response to treatment with environmental estrogens have been reported (Long et al 2000;Steinmetz et al 1998;McKim et al 2001). Yet, these and other published data (Odum et al 1999a(Odum et al , 1999bKanno et al 2001) do not indicate significant differences in uterine response among rat strains. Nonetheless, further data are needed to prove or disprove the existence of consistent differences in sensitivity among strains (Owens and Ashby 2002).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Protocol variables such as the rodent diet and the route of application can apparently result in more profound differences than the strain of rat (Kanno et al 2001(Kanno et al , 2003a(Kanno et al , 2003b. This is further exemplified by recent studies of experimental responses in the uterotrophic bioassay with rodent diets of high/low phytoestrogen contents (Degen et al 2002b;Kanno et al 2002;Yamasaki et al 2002), and an influence of application routes (oral, intraperitoneal or subcutaneous) on uterotrophic weight changes in rats (Kang et al 2000;Laws et al 2000;Yamasaki et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Health concerns regarding human exposures to BPA have in the past arisen from its well-known oestrogenic properties (Salian et al 2011). BPA has affinity for nuclear oestrogen receptors (ERa and ERb) and oestrogenic activity in vivo giving rise to increased uterine wet weights in the uterotrophic assay (Kanno et al 2001). Furthermore, BPA exposure during development has been shown to affect semen quality (Sakaue et al 2001, Salian et al 2009), alter prostate weights (Vom et al 1998, Timms et al 2005, Prins & Korach 2008 and increase the incidence of prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) lesions in the prostate of adult rodents (Prins et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phytoestrogens have recently received great attention because of their beneficial effects, including the prevention of atherosclerosis [9], and bone density loss [10]. However, the consumption of relatively high levels of some phytoestrogens has been shown to increase the risks of breast cancer [11], endometrial hyperplasia [12], and reproductive toxicity [13]. A previous study demonstrated that the high binding affinities of select isoflavones is associated with the structural properties of these molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%