2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The odyssey of the Cache Creek terrane, Canadian Cordillera: Implications for accretionary orogens, tectonic setting of Panthalassa, the Pacific superwell, and break-up of Pangea

Abstract: The Cache Creek terrane (CCT) of the Canadian Cordillera consists of accreted seamounts that originated adjacent to the Tethys Ocean in the Permian. We utilize Potential Translation Path plots to place quantitative constraints on the location of the CCT seamounts through time, including limiting the regions within which accretion events occurred. We assume a starting point for the CCT seamounts in the easternmost Tethys at 280 Ma. Using reasonable translation rates (11 cm/a), accretion to the StikiniaQuesnelli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the years a few workers (Moores 1970;Mattauer et al 1983;Chamberlain and Lambert 1985;Lambert and Chamberlain 1988;Moores 1998) proposed alternative models involving collision of North America with various arcs above westward-dipping subduction zones but they failed to garner traction in the community. Some more recent models for Cordilleran development, created to better explain the overall development of the orogen, posit that the leading edge of North America was subducted to the west beneath an exotic ribbon continent during Cretaceous orogenesis (Johnston and Borel 2007;Johnston 2008;Hildebrand 2009Hildebrand , 2013. Testing these models is difficult because there were no alternating magnetic anomalies produced during the lengthy Cretaceous superchron and huge tracts of the easternmost floor of the Pacific Ocean basin were subducted (Engebretson et al 1985;Atwater 1989).…”
Section: Sommairementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the years a few workers (Moores 1970;Mattauer et al 1983;Chamberlain and Lambert 1985;Lambert and Chamberlain 1988;Moores 1998) proposed alternative models involving collision of North America with various arcs above westward-dipping subduction zones but they failed to garner traction in the community. Some more recent models for Cordilleran development, created to better explain the overall development of the orogen, posit that the leading edge of North America was subducted to the west beneath an exotic ribbon continent during Cretaceous orogenesis (Johnston and Borel 2007;Johnston 2008;Hildebrand 2009Hildebrand , 2013. Testing these models is difficult because there were no alternating magnetic anomalies produced during the lengthy Cretaceous superchron and huge tracts of the easternmost floor of the Pacific Ocean basin were subducted (Engebretson et al 1985;Atwater 1989).…”
Section: Sommairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evidence suggests that it was mostly assembled by 160 Ma, but ultimately amalgamated by 100 Ma, when a basin of unknown nature and width that separated the eastern and western halves of the Peninsular Ranges batholith, the Sierra Nevada, and the Coast Plutonic complex, closed (Kistler 1990;Kimbrough et al 2001;Lackey et al 2008;Gehrels et al 2009;Hildebrand 2013). The North American platform terrace was unaffected by any of these events; either the more outboard collisions were sufficiently small or local that they did not affect the North American margin, or, more likely given the number, variety, and extent of terranes, there was an intervening ocean basin (Johnston and Borel 2007;Johnston 2008;Hildebrand 2009Hildebrand , 2013. That the North American platform terrace was unaffected by these events forms a key part of the evidence that the Cordilleran Ribbon Continent and North America were separate entities until they collided -initially during the Sevier event and later during Laramide terminal collision.…”
Section: Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9), assuming average plate velocities of 1°/Myr (11 cm/yr). The paths are constrained by the accretion of the seamounts ~230 Ma to the StikiniaQuesnellia magmatic arc situated in western Panthalassa, >4000 km west of North America, and their collective accretion to the inferred pericratonic Nisling terrane ~180 Ma and to North America itself by Late Jurassic (Fernie Group) time (Johnston and Borel 2007). Their "Odyssey of the Cache Creek terrane" implies repeated subduction of large oceanic slabs in western tropical Panthalassa between 280 and 150 Ma.…”
Section: ) His Most Controversial Paper Is the Great Alaskan Termentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The viability of these connections depends on the transit times of slabs to the CMB and plumes to the surface. They contended (Johnston and Borel 2007) that "westward subduction of oceanic lithosphere, starting at 180 Ma, that was part of the same plate as Pangea, closed the ocean basin separating the supercontinent from the terranes amalgamated within Panthalassa", and they speculate that slab pull associated with this subduction contributed to the breakup of Pangea. At this point, Stephen and I had never met, so I invited him to Harvard for a departmental seminar, in hopes that seismic tomographers in Cambridge might rise to the challenge of imaging the former intra-Panthalassic slab graveyard.…”
Section: ) His Most Controversial Paper Is the Great Alaskan Termentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation