The occurrence, types, reasons, and mitigation strategies of defensive medicine among physicians: a scoping review

Abstract

Background Defensive Medicine (DM) concept refers to all medical care provided by physicians without increasing the benefits to the patient, the primary purpose of which is to prevent the risk of litigation. Although several studies have been published investigating the occurrence of DM around the world, no review conducted on DM among physicians. Therefore, this study aims to summarize and map the available evidence on occurrence, types of behaviors, and reasons for practicing of DM among physicians and possible solutions and strategies to reduce DM in the literature. Methods This is a scoping review in which we searched Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed in December 2021. Our target was original studies of any type that included data on DM among physicians between 2000 and 2021. We followed the JBI guideline for conducting a scoping review and for increasing the rigor of the study. First, the percentage was used to summarize the occurrence of DM, and then, findings related to types of behaviors and reasons for practicing DM and mitigation strategies were analyzed inductively in NVivo 10 in three stages. Results Twenty-seven studies were included in the review. The overall occurrence of DM practice ranged from 6.7 to 99.8%. Two types of DM behaviors including assurance and avoidance behaviors have been identified. The common reasons for practicing DM were categorized into four themes, patient-related reasons, physician-related reasons, organization-related reasons, and society-related reasons. The main strategies to prevent or reduce DM are structured training and education, restoring physician-patient relationships, reform of the health system, and reform of the liability system. Conclusions The vast majority of research studies were conducted in high-income countries, and studies are needed to measure this phenomenon and its consequences in depth in low- and middle-income countries. Various solutions and strategies are needed to reduce defensive behaviors such as structured training and education, restoring physician-patient relationships, reforming the health system, and reforming the liability system. Keywords Defensive medicine, Defensive practice, Medical malpractice, Physicians, Scoping review

Glaucoma-related malpractice litigation in the United States: A review of the WestLaw database

“…Overall, it is difficult to predict the occurrence of litigation and it can influence physicians to practice defensive medicine, which may involve unnecessary medications or tests, or unnecessary referrals to hospitals or specialists. 15 Since each malpractice case will be different, suggestions to prevent future occurrences will be case dependent. However, general recommendations to decrease the likelihood of experiencing malpractice litigation may also include social workers to address barriers to care or a committee to review malpractice cases to avoid recurrence.…”

“…Other reasons for litigation were failure to treat (2), delay in treatment or referral (2) and injury during exam (1). The alleged complications in these cases included progression of glaucoma (15), blindness (4), and progression of glaucoma and blindness (2). Overall, there were 15 defense, 2 plaintiff, and 1 unknown trial verdicts and one case with a defense verdict with partial settlement claims awarded in the 20 optometry-only cases.…”

Training Opportunities for Managers in Home Health, Hospice, and Community-Based Care Settings

“…Literature recommends using educational needs assessments to strategically recruit, promote, appraise, and guide careers within health organizations. [19][20][21] To inform development of a management skills-focused continuing education program, researchers conducted an educational needs assessment of a large, multistate Visiting Nurse Association to identify skill strengths and gaps of managers in these settings. This study is novel because there is limited research in home health, hospice, and community-based settings.…”

Five Coffin Nails to Informed Consent: An Autoethnography of Suffering Complications in Breastfeeding

“…This is not to say that I believe that the majority of healthcare professionals consciously make a choice to prioritize the legal purpose. Such a practice is probably often adapted unthinkingly as a consequence of a defensive medical culture that pervades clinical practice – a context more and more shaped by fear of legal ramifications (Kakemam et al, 2022).…”