2012
DOI: 10.1038/hr.2012.154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The occurrence rate of cerebrovascular and cardiac events in patients receiving antihypertensive therapy from the post-marketing surveillance data for valsartan in Japan (J-VALID)

Abstract: It is well known that blood pressure (BP) management reduces the incidence of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events. However, it is unclear how many of these events occur in hypertensive patients who receive pharmacological treatment. The aim of this survey was to evaluate the occurrence rate of both types of events in patients receiving valsartan-based treatment. Of 30 366 patients treated with valsartan, 28 356 patients were observed for 2.93 years. Antihypertensive drugs other than valsartan were used i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative risk of cerebrovascular events in patients with a CAVI >10 has been estimated to be 1.73 compared with patients with a CAVI ≤ 10; thus, the study enrolled 2.5 times as many patients with a CAVI ≤ 10 as patients with a CAVI >10 [19] , in whom the risk of cerebrovascular events is anticipated to be 4.6% in 5 years [25] . From these data, the risks of cerebrovascular events in patients with a CAVI ≤ 10 and in those with a CAVI >10 were anticipated to be 0.038 and 0.066 in 5 years, respectively.…”
Section: Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative risk of cerebrovascular events in patients with a CAVI >10 has been estimated to be 1.73 compared with patients with a CAVI ≤ 10; thus, the study enrolled 2.5 times as many patients with a CAVI ≤ 10 as patients with a CAVI >10 [19] , in whom the risk of cerebrovascular events is anticipated to be 4.6% in 5 years [25] . From these data, the risks of cerebrovascular events in patients with a CAVI ≤ 10 and in those with a CAVI >10 were anticipated to be 0.038 and 0.066 in 5 years, respectively.…”
Section: Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comprehensive search identified 15 studies, out of which 4 studies were RCTs, 7 studies were observational, and the remaining 4 studies were post-hoc analyses of RCTs (Table 1). [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] The meta-analysis flow diagram is depicted in Figure 1. In one RCT with dual intervention, patients were randomized to follow strict or standard BP targets and to receive angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or calcium channel blockers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asayama et al 2012 25 Fan et al 2017 26 JATOS 2008 27 Kamishima et al 2019 28 Kario et al 2014 29 Lee et al 2017 30 Lee et al 2018 31 Ogihara et al 2009 32,33 Ogihara et al 2010 34 Teramoto 2012 35 Wan et al 2018 36 Wei et al 2013 37 Yamashita 2013 38 Yamazaki et al 2013 39 Zheng et al 2015 40 The table represents only the study characteristics for which data were available from the majority of reports.…”
Section: Study Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the debatable nature of the clinical significance of the J-curve [1517], major societal guidelines have not previously given due recognition to the phenomenon. While the seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure has been the gold standard for nearly a decade [7], it fails to address the question as to the potential harms with lowering blood pressure beyond a certain threshold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%