1975
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910150304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The occurrence of tumours in f1, f2 and f3 descendants of bd rats exposed to n‐nitrosomethylurea during pregnancy

Abstract: N-nitrosomethylurea (NMU) was administered once IP at a dose of 20 mg/kg to BD female rats on the 18th day of pregnancy. The first generation descendants (F1) were mated to produce a second generation (F2), which were then mated to produce a third generation (F3). While F1 rats were exposed directly to NMU during intrauterine life, it can be reasonably excluded that F2 and F3 descendants were exposed to NMU or its metabolites. F2 and F3 rats received no other treatment and untreated rats served as controls. Ki… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this phenomenon also seems to be a cause of growing concern about the acquired genetic risk for tumour development, since prenatal germinal tissues can simultaneously be a target of the carcinogen. Earlier experimental studies have indeed suggested that fetal germ cells in prenatal organisms may also be damaged by the transplacentally transferred carcinogens, and that such damage may be transmitted to subsequent generations (Tomatis, 1965;Tomatis and Goodall, 1969;Tanaka, 1973;Tomatis et al, 1975), thus causing neoplasms in individuals unexposed to any carcinogens. A different approach to investigating the possible consequences of carcinogen-induced germ-cell damage was the treatment of parents with a carcinogen before conception (Nomura, 1975Napalkov et a/., 1987;Turusov etal., 1992;Tomatis et al, 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this phenomenon also seems to be a cause of growing concern about the acquired genetic risk for tumour development, since prenatal germinal tissues can simultaneously be a target of the carcinogen. Earlier experimental studies have indeed suggested that fetal germ cells in prenatal organisms may also be damaged by the transplacentally transferred carcinogens, and that such damage may be transmitted to subsequent generations (Tomatis, 1965;Tomatis and Goodall, 1969;Tanaka, 1973;Tomatis et al, 1975), thus causing neoplasms in individuals unexposed to any carcinogens. A different approach to investigating the possible consequences of carcinogen-induced germ-cell damage was the treatment of parents with a carcinogen before conception (Nomura, 1975Napalkov et a/., 1987;Turusov etal., 1992;Tomatis et al, 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment of pregnant rats of various strains with N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU) at the end of gestation results in a high incidence of tumors of the nervous system and, in some instances, of the kidney in offspring (Alexandrov, 1969(Alexandrov, , 1974Guthert and Warzok, 1974;Ishida et al, 1975;Tomatis et al, 1975). In the dams, the principal target is the mammary gland (Alexandrov, 1974;Tomatis ef al., 1975).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental evidence of prenatal carcinogenesis was first obtained in mice and later confirmed in guinea-pigs, rats, hamsters, pigs, rabbits and opossums. The first observation in man was reported by Herbst in 1971(Herbst et al, 1971, 1975; and since then several comprehensive reviews on the subject have been published (Tomatis, 1973;Tomatis and Mohr, 1973;Rice, 1973;Rice, 1976).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%