2020
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/566/1/012008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Occurrence of Escherichia coli in Groundwater of Bekasi City (Case Study: Jatiluhur, Sumur Batu, and Jatirangga Urban Villages)

Abstract: The self-supply of groundwater at the household level, and especially in densely populated areas, is vulnerable to fecal contamination. The aim of this study was to assess the level of fecal contamination in groundwater of three urban villages in Bekasi City that depend greatly on groundwater: Jatiluhur, Sumur Batu, and Jatirangga. Water samples were taken from 255 households with various types of water sources in the rainy season from February-March 2020. Escherichia coli (E. coli) concentration was quantifie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 Also a very valuable study done in Bekasi City shows that contamination of well water has occurred in 24% of samples taken poses a very high risk of contamination with E.coli. 30 Based on another study done in 2018, it is clear that the presence of Escherichia coli is not detected in most of the analysis, but it was present in samples collected in the rainy season. 31 Presence of Escherichia coli, clostridium perfringens, and staphylococcus aureus was found as well in another study in Kenia with 36.8 % of the 20 surface water samples tested negative , but in 22.9% of the ground water sources were positive in this three bacteria.…”
Section: Table 4 Micro-biological Analysis *In 100ml Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Also a very valuable study done in Bekasi City shows that contamination of well water has occurred in 24% of samples taken poses a very high risk of contamination with E.coli. 30 Based on another study done in 2018, it is clear that the presence of Escherichia coli is not detected in most of the analysis, but it was present in samples collected in the rainy season. 31 Presence of Escherichia coli, clostridium perfringens, and staphylococcus aureus was found as well in another study in Kenia with 36.8 % of the 20 surface water samples tested negative , but in 22.9% of the ground water sources were positive in this three bacteria.…”
Section: Table 4 Micro-biological Analysis *In 100ml Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A research by Maysarah, et. al [16] found that dug wells, specifically unprotected ones in urban villages, were easily contaminated. The results of the microbial contamination testing by checking the quality of E. coli contamination showed that only 31% of the boreholes were contaminated with E. coli, whereas the percentage reached 44% for the dug wells.…”
Section: Self-supply As Drinking Water Service Level Asssessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Standard fecal bacteria monitoring already forms much of the global regulatory fabric, and researchers have suggested an effective method for integrating AMR surveillance is to adapt an existing standard method to focus on resistant strains of concern. 6 The IDEXX Quanti-Tray system is an US EPA approved semiautomated quantication method based on the Most Probable Number (MPN) model 7 and is widely used in recreational water, 8,9 wastewater, 10,11 and drinking water [12][13][14] quality monitoring for quantifying coliforms, E. coli, enterococci, and Heterotrophic Plate Counts. One prior study conrmed that a modied version of the IDEXX assay could detect antimicrobial resistant organisms in wastewater and surface water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%