The Occurrence and Possible Aetiology of Spondylolysis in a Pre‐contact California Population

Abstract

The occurrence of spondylolysis (neural arch separation at the pars interarticularis) is reported in a pre‐contact (720–550 Cal BP) Central California population, CA‐CCo‐647 (n = 46). Spondylolysis was examined within this population to assess differences in sex, age, and possible relationships with biological affinity. Furthermore, prevalence rates of spondylolysis were compared across various populations to discern the aetiology of the defect. Within CA‐CCo‐647, spondylolysis was found in 17.4% (8/46) of the population. All occurrences are complete, bilateral separations of the neural arch in the lower lumbar (L4 and L5). The defect is not seen in individuals below the age of 18, and there is no correlation between adult age and spondylolysis. Male individuals display the defect at a higher rate (30.8% ‐ 4/13) than female individuals (12.1% ‐ 4/33); however, this is not a statistically significant finding. There does seem to be a correlation between an individual's sex and the onset of the defect; male individuals display spondylolysis at a younger age than female individuals. This finding could represent differences in activity patterns among young male and female individuals. In a biological distance analysis using craniometric data, male and female individuals with spondylolysis clustered closely, suggesting a genetic component for the defect. Finally, significant differences were found in spondylolysis prevalence between various populations representing distinct geographic and temporal settings. Significant differences were found among Native pre‐contact samples and even between two comparable pre‐contact California skeletal samples. These populations all engaged in distinct activities and were likely composed of genetically distinct groups of individuals, which may account for the differences in spondylolysis prevalence. All of these findings, both within CA‐CCo‐647 and between the various samples, suggest that the aetiology of spondylolysis is likely an interaction of genes and activity. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

A rare case of multilevel spondylolysis—A nineteenth century Chinese immigrant to Peru from Castillo de Huarmey archaeological site

“…The occurrence of spondylolysis, often associated with spondylolisthesis, is reported quite frequently in bioarchaeological literature from all over the globe. It has been reported for the prehistoric populations of Brasil (Lessa, 2011), Chinchorro population of Chilean Atacama desert ( Arriaza, 1995;Arriaza & Standen, 2008), pre-contact California (Pilloud and Canzonieri, 2014), American South-West (Bridges, 1989), archaeological Inuit sites from Arctic Canada (Merbs, 2002) and mediaeval Britain (Mays, 2006;Ward et al, 2010)-to name a few.…”

Nouvelles données sur l’épidémiologie passée et actuelle de la spondylolyse lombo-sacrée et son association avec la spina bifida occulta

“…Dans les populations anciennes la spondylolyse est une lésion fréquemment observée toutes périodes confondues. Sa prévalence est toutefois très variable (de 0 à 71 %) en fonction des populations et des époques (Stewart, 1931 ;Bridges, 1989 ;Arriaza, 1997 ;Merbs, 2002 ;Weiss, 2009 ;Lessa, 2011 ;Pilloud et Canzonieri, 2014). Le plus ancien cas décrit à notre connaissance provient de la sierra de Atapuerca (Espagne) et date du Pléistocène moyen (Trinkaus, 2018).…”

Lumbar spondylolysis in ancient Siberian Eskimo

“…It is generally accepted that spondylolysis is a fatigue fracture, thus an acquired condition. Most of the researchers, however, lean towards its multifactorial aetiology, including a spectrum of both genetically inherent and biomechanical factors (D'Angelo del Campo et al, 2017; Pilloud & Canzonieri, 2014; Whitesides, Horton, Hutton, & Hodges, 2005).…”