2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2004.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The occurrence and origin of prominent massive, pumice-rich ignimbrite lobes within the Late Pleistocene Abrigo Ignimbrite, Tenerife, Canary Islands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Unit IV, the increase in lensP thickness and length, increase in lensP average grain size and juxtaposition of lensP with lithic-rich mLT with distance from source suggests the pumice did not segregate and decouple from a more lithic rich basal region of the flow, as interpreted in Calder et al (2000) and Pittari et al, (2005). Instead, in this case it is more likely that the lensP effectively segregated a proportion of the pumice into concentrated lenses, which traveled at the level of neutral buoyancy until the current's density decreased to less than that of the pumice concentrations, resulting in en masse deposition of the lensP (e.g., Druitt, 1995).…”
Section: Units III and Iv Distal Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In Unit IV, the increase in lensP thickness and length, increase in lensP average grain size and juxtaposition of lensP with lithic-rich mLT with distance from source suggests the pumice did not segregate and decouple from a more lithic rich basal region of the flow, as interpreted in Calder et al (2000) and Pittari et al, (2005). Instead, in this case it is more likely that the lensP effectively segregated a proportion of the pumice into concentrated lenses, which traveled at the level of neutral buoyancy until the current's density decreased to less than that of the pumice concentrations, resulting in en masse deposition of the lensP (e.g., Druitt, 1995).…”
Section: Units III and Iv Distal Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…LensP that are asymmetric with pronounced downstream terminations and diffuse tails are interpreted to represent exposure in the direction of flow (e.g., Ad-2b, Figure 7b; Pittari et al, 2005); lensP that are more symmetric and diffuse in two directions, or are discontinuous lenses that grade vertically and laterally into additional pumice lenses or mLT (Figure 9c -base of Unit I exposure) are interpreted to represent exposure perpendicular to flow. The lensP within Units I and II are more symmetric and diffuse laterally at locations AD-1 ( Figure 5) and AD-3 ( Figure 9c), suggesting deposition occurred into or oblique to the outcrops.…”
Section: Units I and Ii -Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Rounding of pumice clasts is often interpreted as evidence for transport in pyroclastic density currents (e.g., Wilson and Hildreth 1998), hence clast shape may preserve information about the transport processes within currents. Particle roundness is expected to increase with transport distance in density currents, and significant rounding of clasts is often found in distal deposits (e.g., Calder et al 2000) and in pumice lobes (e.g., Pittari et al 2005). In some deposits there is enough variability in clast roundness and shape to distinguish among genetic processes and elucidate transport dynamics (Dellino and Volpe 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%