2015
DOI: 10.1175/jcli-d-14-00555.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Observed State of the Water Cycle in the Early Twenty-First Century

Abstract: This study quantifies mean annual and monthly fluxes of Earth's water cycle over continents and ocean basins during the first decade of the millennium. To the extent possible, the flux estimates are based on satellite measurements first and data-integrating models second. A careful accounting of uncertainty in the estimates is included. It is applied within a routine that enforces multiple water and energy budget constraints simultaneously in a variational framework in order to produce objectively determined o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

21
232
2
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(260 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
(159 reference statements)
21
232
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This 3% difference is within the error bars (Adler et al 2012) of GPCP, but is also of the same sign (and rough magnitude) of the adjustment needed for water cycle closure . Thus, for the same time period the new V2.3 numbers seem to compare very well with the Behrangi et al (2014) satellite estimates and the Rodell et al (2015) water balance values. Another merged data analysis product, the Climate Prediction Center Merged Analysis of Precipitation (CMAP) (Xie and Arkin 1997) has a very similar global ocean mean value (Behrangi et al 2014), but with a higher value in the tropics and a much lower value in high latitudes (Adler et al 2012;Behrangi et al 2014).…”
Section: Global and Tropical Mean Precipitationsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This 3% difference is within the error bars (Adler et al 2012) of GPCP, but is also of the same sign (and rough magnitude) of the adjustment needed for water cycle closure . Thus, for the same time period the new V2.3 numbers seem to compare very well with the Behrangi et al (2014) satellite estimates and the Rodell et al (2015) water balance values. Another merged data analysis product, the Climate Prediction Center Merged Analysis of Precipitation (CMAP) (Xie and Arkin 1997) has a very similar global ocean mean value (Behrangi et al 2014), but with a higher value in the tropics and a much lower value in high latitudes (Adler et al 2012;Behrangi et al 2014).…”
Section: Global and Tropical Mean Precipitationsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…For example, Trenberth et al (2009) adjusted the GPCP value upward by 5% to achieve a global water balance. In another, more recent, example, Rodell et al (2015) examined the mean global water cycle for the first decade of the twenty-first century by using various satellite-based and conventional data sets, with reanalysis used to fill certain gaps. Initially, they used the magnitudes of the components as given by the means over the first decade of the twenty- first century.…”
Section: Global and Tropical Mean Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, the model does not include any human-induced changes in water storages, which yet contribute to observed TWS variability in many regions Rodell et al, 2015). Other simplified or ignored hydrological processes include the coincident occurrence of rain and snowfall, liquid water capacity of snow, interception, freeze-thaw dynamics within the soil, capillary rise, and other surface-groundwater interactions, the effect of vegetation or other surface properties, and lateral flow from one grid cell to another.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their values probably also included Antarctica, as they mention a land area of 144 000 km 2 , so a direct comparison is not straightforward. Based on the assessment of Rodell et al (2015) (see next paragraph), Antarctica's share in global P , AET, and Q is about 2.1, 0.2, and 4.9 %, respectively, and these percentages were added to the WaterGAP results. Surprisingly, global P of PGFv2.1 is 7.4 % lower than P of Hanasaki et al (2010).…”
Section: Uncertainty Of Simulated Water Balance Components Due To CLImentioning
confidence: 99%