2013
DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2013.203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The obesity paradox in heart failure patients with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of individual patient data

Abstract: In patients with chronic HF, the obesity paradox was present in both those with reduced and preserved ventricular systolic function. Mortality in both HF subtypes was U-shaped, with a nadir at 30.0-34.9 kg m(-2).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
102
2
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
14
102
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2,7-9,19, 20 In the present study, we analyzed the subset of HF patients most affected by AF, which included a relatively high percentage of patients with low BMI compared with Western studies. 21- 23 The main findings were as follows: (1) the risk of the composite primary endpoint (all-cause death and re-hospitalization for ADHF) was higher in patients with AF than in those without AF; (2) the incidence rate of the primary endpoint was higher in patients with AF from the HFpEF group, but not the HFrEF group; (3) the incidence rate of the primary endpoint was higher in patients with AF from the HFpEF group who had low-medium BMI; and (4) AF was an independent predictor of the endpoint only in the HFpEF BMI <25 group. Taken together, the prognostic impact of AF might differ in non-obese and obese HFpEF patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2,7-9,19, 20 In the present study, we analyzed the subset of HF patients most affected by AF, which included a relatively high percentage of patients with low BMI compared with Western studies. 21- 23 The main findings were as follows: (1) the risk of the composite primary endpoint (all-cause death and re-hospitalization for ADHF) was higher in patients with AF than in those without AF; (2) the incidence rate of the primary endpoint was higher in patients with AF from the HFpEF group, but not the HFrEF group; (3) the incidence rate of the primary endpoint was higher in patients with AF from the HFpEF group who had low-medium BMI; and (4) AF was an independent predictor of the endpoint only in the HFpEF BMI <25 group. Taken together, the prognostic impact of AF might differ in non-obese and obese HFpEF patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Echocardiographic analyses of in vivo cardiac function were carried out at baseline (4 weeks) and 6,8,14, and 18 weeks of the treatment protocol. Mice were anesthetized with 0.75% isoflurane for the duration of the procedure.…”
Section: Echocardiography and Tissue Doppler Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A low BMI in heart failure patients is associated with decreased survival. This paradoxical association is found in patients with preserved and reduced ejection fraction, with a nadir of mortality in one individual patient meta-analysis (n = 23,967) of 34.0-34.9 kg/m 2 (8). A number of experimental studies have also shown favorable effects of high-fat (HF) diet on cardiac function and survival in different disease states such as myocardial infarction, heart failure, and hypertension (see ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…43 Independent of other key prognostic variables for HFPEF patients, there was a U-shaped relationship, with the greatest rate of adverse outcomes in the lowest and highest BMI categories, which was called the "obesity paradox". [40][41][42][43] Although the pathophysiology behind the obesity paradox is unknown, several possible explanations have been proposed. Patients able to maintain a healthy BMI may harbor a favorable inflammatory, hormonal, and metabolic milieu and avert a catabolic state.…”
Section: Thyroid Dysfunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%