2006
DOI: 10.1300/j106v13n03_05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nuts, Bolts, and Teaching Opportunities of Real-Time Reference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors excluded articles like case studies or descriptive reports of chat services at a single library. These types of articles are easily found and provide some excellent insight into the value of providing instruction during chat scenarios (Ellis, 2004;Johnston, 2003;Taddeo and Hackenberg, 2006;Woodard, 2005). Offering library instruction through live chat is one of RSR 46,4 the themes that emerged during their review of the available empirical research from 1995 to January 2010.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors excluded articles like case studies or descriptive reports of chat services at a single library. These types of articles are easily found and provide some excellent insight into the value of providing instruction during chat scenarios (Ellis, 2004;Johnston, 2003;Taddeo and Hackenberg, 2006;Woodard, 2005). Offering library instruction through live chat is one of RSR 46,4 the themes that emerged during their review of the available empirical research from 1995 to January 2010.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teaching occurred in roughly one third (33.4%) of chats sampled and in just under half of chats where the initial question was research-related (70 of 162 chats, or 43.2%, see Table B2). This is on the lower end of the findings in the literature although lower rates have been reported (Hervieux & Tummon, 2018;Taddeo & Hackenberg, 2006). This rate is significantly lower than the findings of another collaborative service, NCKnows (Daly, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Many studies have estimated the amount of teaching that occurs specifically during chat reference transactions. Hervieux and Tummon (2018) and Taddeo and Hackenberg (2006) found low levels of teaching on their chat services, with 23% and 26% of chats showing evidence of information literacy instruction, respectively. However, most single-institution chat services have found that from 60 to 95% of transactions demonstrate instances of teaching (Dempsey, 2017;Johnston, 2003;Moyo, 2006;Oakleaf & VanScoy, 2010;Ward, 2004;Zhuo et al, 2006).…”
Section: Teaching Practices In Chat Referencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Avery and Ward (2010) further analyze the applicability of ACRL's Information Literacy standards as instruction goals for reference, and suggest training tools for recognizing instructional opportunities in reference. Taddeo and Hackenberg (2006) point out that the limited contact time between librarians and patrons precludes teaching students the full range of research strategies and skills, but librarians “can present important concepts in ways that stimulate learning and retention”. Desai and Graves (2006) analyze how and when patrons ask for instruction in digital reference, and detail the responses of librarians to these requests.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%