2018
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nutritional nexus: Linking niche, habitat variability and prey composition in a generalist marine predator

Abstract: Our understanding of the niche concept will remain limited while the quantity and range of different food types eaten remain a dominant proxy for niche breadth, as this does not account for the broad ecological context that governs diet. Linking nutrition, physiology and behaviour is critical to predict the extent to which a species adjusts its nutritional niche breadth at the levels of prey ("prey composition niche," defined as the range of prey compositions eaten) and diet ("realized nutritional niche" is th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(140 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research suggests that most critical macro-and micronutrients are well represented in sea otter diets and that energy is the primary resource driving sea otter prey selection (Oftedal et al, 2007). However, variability in macronutrient composition among prey species can be an important driver of diet choice and niche space (Machovsky-Capuska et al, 2018;Machovsky-Capuska, Senior, Simpson et al, 2016;Mayntz, Raubenheimer, Salomon, Toft, & Simpson, 2005;Raubenheimer, Simpson, & Mayntz, 2009;Tait, Raubenheimer, Stockin, Merriman, & Machovsky-Capuska, 2014). Accordingly, including data on the macronutrient content of prey may enhance our characterization of niche space, but quantifying macronutrient profiles for the diverse suite of prey that sea otters consumed was beyond the scope of this study.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous research suggests that most critical macro-and micronutrients are well represented in sea otter diets and that energy is the primary resource driving sea otter prey selection (Oftedal et al, 2007). However, variability in macronutrient composition among prey species can be an important driver of diet choice and niche space (Machovsky-Capuska et al, 2018;Machovsky-Capuska, Senior, Simpson et al, 2016;Mayntz, Raubenheimer, Salomon, Toft, & Simpson, 2005;Raubenheimer, Simpson, & Mayntz, 2009;Tait, Raubenheimer, Stockin, Merriman, & Machovsky-Capuska, 2014). Accordingly, including data on the macronutrient content of prey may enhance our characterization of niche space, but quantifying macronutrient profiles for the diverse suite of prey that sea otters consumed was beyond the scope of this study.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multidimensional niche space of a species (Hutchinson, ) can be examined by mapping a species’ biotic and abiotic requirements and then used to predict what interactions a species may have within a larger community (Holt, ). Recently, nutrition, physiology, and behaviour have also been used to better characterize niche breadth and predict a species’ trophic interactions (Machovsky‐Capuska et al, ). Although once viewed as static, niche space is no longer seen as a fixed property, but one that can change as a function of intraspecific variation (Baudrot, Perasso, Fritsch, Giraudoux, & Raoul, ; Ingram, Costa‐Pereira, & Araujo, ; Lafferty, Belant, & Phillips, ; Newsome et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Daily energy needs of animals are mostly achieved by the metabolization of macromolecules (protein, lipid and carbohydrates) obtained from foods (Nagy, Girard, & Brown, 1999). Environmental fluctuations influence the nutritional composition and energy contents of foods shaping the foraging behaviour and habitat use of wild animals (Machovsky-Capuska et al, 2018). Under these circumstances, fieldbased research has the challenge to overcome complex logistical constraints to collect reliable data on nutritional and energy requirements in free-ranging animals (Machovsky-Capuska et al, 2016).…”
Section: Movement Costs and Energy Expenditurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, temperature and other environmental factors are known to influence the nutritional quality of prey as well as the nutritional requirements of predators. Incorporating nutritional ecology into assessments of climate change effects (Rosenblatt and Schmitz, 2016;Machovsky-Capuska et al, 2018) is just one of the improvements that will become possible as data availability increases. Our knowledge of the importance of factors that are likely to mitigate or even feedback against climate change, can be incorporated in more complex assessments.…”
Section: Incorporating Greater Complexity Into Ecological Risk Assessmentioning
confidence: 99%