The ability to sustain growth at low availability of nltrogen (N) was examined in 6 species of macroalgae with different growth strategies by compdrlng substrate dependent growth kinetics. The N rcqulred to support optimal growth and the N uptake kinetics of 2 slow-growing algae. Fucus r~esicu-losus and Codium fragilc, and 4 fast-growing specles, Chnetolnorpha Ijn~~rn, Cladophora serica, Cerarn~um rubrum and Ulva lactuca, were experimentally determ~ned In summer when the algae were N limited. The N required to support maximum growth vaned 16-fold among specles, w~t h fdst-gro\v-ing algae having the highest N demands. The high N requirements of ephemeral algae were caused by u p to 13-fold h~g h e r growth ratps and 2-to 3-fold higher N content at maximum growth. Also, the fastgrowing specles took up ammonium and nitrate 4 to 6 times faster per u n~t of biomass than slo\v-growing speclcs at both low and high substrate concentrations, but the ratios of maxlinum Pi uptake to requirements were larger among the slow-growing algae. Thus, the fast-growing specles tended to requlre relatively higher external concrntrations of inorganic N to saturate the11 growth Under N limited conditions, all 6 macroalgae were able to explo~t pulses of high concentrations of ammonium by taking u p ammonium a t transiently enhanced rates (i.e. surge uptake). Uptake was, however, only marginally enhanced at low, and naturally occurring, concentrations of ammonium, suggesting that surge uptake is of minor ecological importance. Our results show that large, slow-growing macroalgae may be better able to meet their N requirements at low N availability than fast-growing species. This is consistent with the common observation that nutrient-poor coastal areas are dominated by slowgrowing macroalgae rather than ephemeral species, although ephemeral species have higher N uptake capacities.