2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/aaa83d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The NuSTAR Extragalactic Surveys: Source Catalog and the Compton-thick Fraction in the UDS Field

Abstract: We present the results and the source catalog of the NuSTAR survey in the UKIDSS Ultra Deep Survey (UDS) field, bridging the gap in depth and area between NuSTAR's ECDFS and COSMOS surveys. The survey covers a ∼0.6 deg 2 area of the field for a total observing time of ∼1.75 Ms, to a half-area depth of ∼155 ks corrected for vignetting at 3-24 keV, and reaching sensitivity limits at half-area in the full (3-24 keV), soft (3-8 keV), and hard (8-24 keV) bands of 2.2×10 −14 erg cm −2 s −1 , 1.0×10 −14 erg cm −2… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the model with the enhanced Compton-thick fraction appears to more accurately describe the Compton-thick counts at these fainter fluxes. This latter model has a Compton-thick fraction of 0.14 at a 8-24 keV flux of 2.7 × 10 −14 erg cm −2 s −1 , very similar to what is measured from NuSTAR observations (Masini et al 2018). The picture that emerges from these experiments is one where both the reflection fraction and possibly the Compton-thick fraction increase with z.…”
Section: The Impact Of the Compton-thick Fractionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In contrast, the model with the enhanced Compton-thick fraction appears to more accurately describe the Compton-thick counts at these fainter fluxes. This latter model has a Compton-thick fraction of 0.14 at a 8-24 keV flux of 2.7 × 10 −14 erg cm −2 s −1 , very similar to what is measured from NuSTAR observations (Masini et al 2018). The picture that emerges from these experiments is one where both the reflection fraction and possibly the Compton-thick fraction increase with z.…”
Section: The Impact Of the Compton-thick Fractionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…We compare the Swift-BAT overall counts, as well as NuSTAR Extragalactic Survey overall number counts from Harrison et al (2016), with existing models. The NuSTAR Extragalactic Surveys are a wedding cake survey, and we look at three tiers in this work: UKIDSS Ultra Deep Survey (UDS; Masini et al 2018), COSMOS (Civano et al 2015), and Serendipitous Survey (Alexander et al 2013;. The details of each of these surveys are given in Table 2.…”
Section: The Observed Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Masini et al (2018) estimated the Compton-think fraction of Compton-thick sources, using NuSTAR observations in the UKIDSS Ultra deep field. They find an observed Compton-thick fraction of 8.4 ± 2% in the 8-24 keV band at a flux of 2.7×10 −14 erg cm −2 s −1 .…”
Section: The Intrinsic Fraction Of Compton-thick Agnmentioning
confidence: 99%