The nurse outcomes and patient outcomes following the High‐Quality Care Project

Abstract

Background There have been many single cross‐sectional studies on nurse or patient outcomes. However, long‐term evidence on improving nurse and patient outcomes is still limited. The High‐Quality Care Project is a national project in China for improving nurse and patient outcomes by implementing primary nursing. Aim (1) To assess the long‐term changes in nurse and patient outcomes in the context of the High‐Quality Care Project. (2) To explore the potential influences of primary nursing on nurse and patient outcomes based on this study and broader existing evidence. Methods The data of two cross‐sectional studies were used for analysis. The two cross‐sectional studies were conducted before (2009) and after (2016) the High‐Quality Care Project. A total of 1376 nurses and 904 patients from 40 units of 10 tertiary hospitals were surveyed. Reliable and validated instruments were used to measure nurse and patient outcomes. Multilevel modelling was the main method for data analysis. Results Nurses in 2016 were more satisfied than nurses in 2009 with most dimensions of nurse work environment and job satisfaction. However, they were not more satisfied with burnout, global job satisfaction or intention to leave their job. Nurses in 2016 also reported better quality of patient care and patient safety while their patients reported higher patient satisfaction. Conclusion The analysis of our results based on existing evidence indicates that primary nursing could be considered as a potentially effective way to improve nurse work environment and patient outcomes. More studies with rigorous study design from micro perspectives would be useful to further explore the direct effects of primary nursing on nurse or/and patient outcomes. Implications for nursing and nursing policy Policymakers, healthcare service leaders and nurse managers should make efforts to provide multi‐level supports to cultivate an encouraging environment for nurses to practice primary nursing, because the implementation of primary nursing may improve the nurse work environment and patient outcomes. Furthermore, improving nurse participation in hospital affairs and developing nursing discipline and education for increasing nursing staff resource and nurses’ capacity – which all need policy and management supports – are crucial to further improve nurse and patient outcomes.

Health workforce forecast in the university hospital: evidence from Lithuania

“…An appropriately educated well-resourced midwifery workforce is recognized as an essential element within national workforce planning activity. A shortage of midwives could have serious implications for the care of women during pregnancy, birth, and the early parenting period [42,43,44]. Factors related to the lack of midwives are poor access to education, workloads, and stress [33].…”

“…It is therefore expected that the shortages will accelerate in the coming decade and will be more serious than the cyclical shortages of the past. This nursing and other health care specialist shortage will ultimately constrain health system reform and innovation, and contribute to escalating costs [42]. As the need for our health care specialists is predicted for one of the largest university hospitals in the Baltic States, which provides all levels of services, it is important to be aware of the need for safe and timely services.…”

Primary Intensivists and Nurses for Long-Stay Patients: A Survey of Practices and Perceptions at Academic PICUs*

“…Our findings on the perceived benefits and disadvantages of primary practices align with previous PICU and non-PICU studies. Single-center interviews with nurses reveal their support for primary nursing and perceptions that it provides consistent, high-quality, individualized care, improves communication, leads to better relationships with families, and decreased adverse events (20,(35)(36)(37)(38). Among intensivists in one PICU, a fifth marginally felt that the time required to provide continuity for LSP outweighed the benefits (33).…”

The Primary Nursing Care Model and Inpatients’ Nursing-Sensitive Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Quantitative Studies

“…This systematic review included five studies [29][30][31][32][33]. All studies are recent, with three published in 2020, one in 2019, and another in 2018.…”

“…All analyses were conducted in large acute care hospitals, two of which were university hospitals. Four of the studies have samples of more than 300 participants [29,30,32,33], and one study had only 96 subjects as a sample [31]. One of the studies was a quasi-experimental study [29], and the remaining were cross-sectional studies.…”