1979
DOI: 10.1243/jmes_jour_1979_021_032_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Numerical Solution of Choked and Supercritical Ideal Gas Flow through Orifices and Convergent Conical Nozzles

Abstract: The paper describes the numerical solution of the equations of compressible flow through axisymmetric convergent nozzles. The class of supercritical flows is considered, in which the gas velocities in the jet downstream from the throat are supersonic. The subsonic region of the flowfield is solved in the hodograph plane by a finite-difference method. The supersonic region is solved in the physical plane by the method of characteristics. The stream function distribution on the sonic line is adjusted iteratively… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
5

Year Published

1987
1987
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
7
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that under the condition (P 1 /P 0 ) > (P 1 /P 0 ) * a decrease of P 1 leads to an increase of the flow rate if P 0 is fixed. However, under the condition ( Liepmann (1961) 0.0507 Ar 5/3 0.812 1.48 Barashkin et al (1977b) 0.0420 Ar 5/3 0.826 1.50 Jitschin et al (1999) 0.0162 He, Ar, Kr 5/3 0.853 1.55 Perry (1949) 0.151 air 1.4 0.843 1.45 Fujimoto & Usami (1984) 0.050 air 1.4 0.844 1.45 Liepmann (1961) 0.0478 N 2 1.4 0.824 1.41 Barashkin et al (1977b) 0.0420 H 2 1.4 0.853 1.46 Jitschin et al (1999) 0.0162 H 2 , N 2 , air 1.4 0.869 1.49 Alder (1979) 0 diatomic 1.4 0.830 1.42 Liepmann (1961) 0.0478 CO 2 1.3 0.830 1.39 Barashkin et al (1977b) 0.0420 CO 2 1.3 0.856 1.43 Jitschin et al (1999) 0.0162 CO 2 1.3 0.891 1.49 Jitschin et al (1999) 0.0162 C 3 H 8 1.13 0.876 1.41 Table 1. Discharge coefficient C and flow rate W in the hydrodynamic regime (δ → ∞) for outflow into vacuum (P 1 /P 0 = 0) for various specific heat ratios γ .…”
Section: Statement Of the Problem And Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is known that under the condition (P 1 /P 0 ) > (P 1 /P 0 ) * a decrease of P 1 leads to an increase of the flow rate if P 0 is fixed. However, under the condition ( Liepmann (1961) 0.0507 Ar 5/3 0.812 1.48 Barashkin et al (1977b) 0.0420 Ar 5/3 0.826 1.50 Jitschin et al (1999) 0.0162 He, Ar, Kr 5/3 0.853 1.55 Perry (1949) 0.151 air 1.4 0.843 1.45 Fujimoto & Usami (1984) 0.050 air 1.4 0.844 1.45 Liepmann (1961) 0.0478 N 2 1.4 0.824 1.41 Barashkin et al (1977b) 0.0420 H 2 1.4 0.853 1.46 Jitschin et al (1999) 0.0162 H 2 , N 2 , air 1.4 0.869 1.49 Alder (1979) 0 diatomic 1.4 0.830 1.42 Liepmann (1961) 0.0478 CO 2 1.3 0.830 1.39 Barashkin et al (1977b) 0.0420 CO 2 1.3 0.856 1.43 Jitschin et al (1999) 0.0162 CO 2 1.3 0.891 1.49 Jitschin et al (1999) 0.0162 C 3 H 8 1.13 0.876 1.41 Table 1. Discharge coefficient C and flow rate W in the hydrodynamic regime (δ → ∞) for outflow into vacuum (P 1 /P 0 = 0) for various specific heat ratios γ .…”
Section: Statement Of the Problem And Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some numerical data for the outflow into vacuum in the transition regime are reported by Shakhov (1974) and Sharipov (2002b). In the hydrodynamic regime the problem was solved by Alder (1979) on the basis of the Euler equation, which is valid for high values of the Reynolds number. In the case of low Reynolds number Roscoe (1949) and Hasimoto (1958) solved the Stokes equation analytically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was attributed to the change in boundary conditions at the exit planes when the gas separated to form a free jet. Alder et al [9] described how a jet becomes supersonic with its boundaries expanding to adjust to the lower surrounding downstream chamber pressure resulting in a higher flow rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…decreasing pressure ratio) beyond the critical value due to the changing shape and location of the multi-dimensional sonic surface around the plane of the orifice lip. In comprehensive theoretical studies by Alder et al [9] and Jobson [10], a numerical solution of choked and supercritical orifice gas flows tries to explain the increase of flow rate beyond the critical pressure ratio as the downstream jet is becoming supersonic. The pressure ratio needs to be low in order for the position of the sonic surface to stabilize in shape and position, thereby allowing the flow to "choke".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several experimental investigations regarding flow through finite (or zero) length channels [126,138,127]. Results include mass flow rates, discharge coefficients and interpolating formulas.…”
Section: Flow Through Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%