1975
DOI: 10.2307/3725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Numerical Responses of Insect Predators to Changes in Prey Density

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One measure of a predator's physiological state is its body weight (Anderson 1974;Tanaka and Ito 1982;Matsura 1981). Predators that attack prey more frequently, in general, are heavier, lay more eggs, and develop faster than predators that attack prey less frequently (Crawley 1975;Hassell 1978;Eberhard 1979;Baumgaertner et al 1981;Lenski 1984). Predators that attack prey more frequently, in general, are heavier, lay more eggs, and develop faster than predators that attack prey less frequently (Crawley 1975;Hassell 1978;Eberhard 1979;Baumgaertner et al 1981;Lenski 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One measure of a predator's physiological state is its body weight (Anderson 1974;Tanaka and Ito 1982;Matsura 1981). Predators that attack prey more frequently, in general, are heavier, lay more eggs, and develop faster than predators that attack prey less frequently (Crawley 1975;Hassell 1978;Eberhard 1979;Baumgaertner et al 1981;Lenski 1984). Predators that attack prey more frequently, in general, are heavier, lay more eggs, and develop faster than predators that attack prey less frequently (Crawley 1975;Hassell 1978;Eberhard 1979;Baumgaertner et al 1981;Lenski 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crawley, 1975;Turchin et al, 1999;Abrams & Ginsburg, 2000;Lombaert et al, 2006). They found that predation risk affects prey behaviour and leads to avoidance and dispersal of the prey (Jeffries & Lawton, 1984, Berdegue et al, 1996recently, Skelhorn et al, 2011;Gonthier, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the density-dependant deaths are represented as the second-order decay processes to represent competitive deaths and carrying capacity of the environment (DeAngelis, 1992;Malchow, 2000). A Holling Type III function is used to represent fish (F G ) feeding on invertebrates (Z G ), and all other feeding processes are represented by Type II functions (Holling, 1959;Cushing, 1959Cushing, , 1968Crawley, 1973;Taylor, 1984;DeAngelis, 1992). Since F G is a constant model parameter, Type III function makes the F G À Z G interaction to depend mainly on invertebrate concentration, corresponding to fish ingesting more during high invertebrate availability and using internal fat cells to maintain the constant fish concentration during Z G scarcity (Malchow, 2000;Malchow et al, 2001).…”
Section: Two-zone Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%