1996
DOI: 10.1016/0165-3806(96)00069-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The numerical matching of source and target populations in the CNS: the inferior olive to Purkinje cell projection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These raw values were overestimates, as cell nuclei can be split during sectioning and may thus appear in more than one section; therefore, the corrected number of Purkinje cells was obtained by multiplying the raw values by the Hendry correction factor for each animal (Hendry, 1976). We chose to use this traditional correction factor for our cell counts instead of more recently developed stereological techniques (Williams & Rakic, 1988;Andersen et al, 1992), so that our results would be directly comparable with previously published Purkinje cell counts, including our own (Herrup & Mullen, 1979;Zanjani et al, 1992;Herrup et al, 1996;Doulazmi et al, 1999).…”
Section: Histologymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These raw values were overestimates, as cell nuclei can be split during sectioning and may thus appear in more than one section; therefore, the corrected number of Purkinje cells was obtained by multiplying the raw values by the Hendry correction factor for each animal (Hendry, 1976). We chose to use this traditional correction factor for our cell counts instead of more recently developed stereological techniques (Williams & Rakic, 1988;Andersen et al, 1992), so that our results would be directly comparable with previously published Purkinje cell counts, including our own (Herrup & Mullen, 1979;Zanjani et al, 1992;Herrup et al, 1996;Doulazmi et al, 1999).…”
Section: Histologymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The number of granule cells per hemi-cerebellum was significantly higher in Grid2 Lc/ϩ ;BaxϪ/Ϫ cerebella (10.80 Ϯ 0.78 ϫ 10 6 ) compared with Grid2 Lc/ϩ ;Baxϩ/ϩ (3.16 Ϯ 0.35 ϫ 10 6 ) and Grid2 Lc/ϩ ;Baxϩ/Ϫ (2.87 Ϯ 0.13 Ϫ 10 6 ) cerebella (see Fig. 4B Sixty to 75% of the inferior olivary neurons normally degenerate in Grid2 Lc/ϩ mice following the death of their Purkinje cell targets (Caddy et al, 1979;Heckroth et al, 1991;Herrup et al, 1996). Fifty-four percent of these neurons have disappeared by P26 (Caddy and Biscoe, 1979).…”
Section: Bax Deletion Inhibits Granule Cell Death In Lurcher Micementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the olivocerebellar system, surgical and genetic lesions have shown that the survival of olivary neurons and granule cells is dependent on interactions with their PC targets (Harkmark, 1956;Sotelo and Changeux, 1974;Caddy and Biscoe, 1979;Wetts and Herrup, 1982a,b;Zanjani et al, 1990;Vogel et al, 1991;Herrup et al, 1996). Many olivary neurons and granule cells undergo apoptotic cell death when deprived of their target Smeyne et al, 1995).…”
Section: Granule Cell Survival and Olivary Neuron Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early cerebellar atrophy is related to a massive reduction in the number of PCs (reduced by about 80% Doulazmi et al, 2001) and study of chimeras has shown that this defect is due to an intrinsic action of the gene in the PCs (Herrup & Mullen, 1979b). The lack of Purkinje cells induces a near total loss of their afferents, the granule cells and inferior olivary neurons, during the first postnatal month (Herrup et al, 1996). Part of the granule cell loss is due to the action of RORa on one of its target gene in the cerebellum, sonic hedgehog, since its addition to Rora sg=sg organotypic cultures restores granule precursor proliferation (Gold et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The most obvious phenotype of homozygous Rora knockout mice (Rora À=À ) and natural RORa deficient staggerer (Rora sg=sg ) mice is an ataxic gait, associated with a massive cerebellar degeneration due to a defect in Purkinje cell development (Herrup et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%