2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-013-0943-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The numerical investigation of spreading process of two viscoelastic droplets impact problem by using an improved SPH scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spreading tendency of D1 is more violent than that of D2 because part of the impacting energy of D2 is absorbed by D1. All the results in Figures and obtained by the viscous IFS‐CR‐MPS method agree well with the improved SPH results in Figures (a) and (a) of Jiang et al .…”
Section: Numerical Investigationsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The spreading tendency of D1 is more violent than that of D2 because part of the impacting energy of D2 is absorbed by D1. All the results in Figures and obtained by the viscous IFS‐CR‐MPS method agree well with the improved SPH results in Figures (a) and (a) of Jiang et al .…”
Section: Numerical Investigationsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The definitions of the abbreviations used in this section are summarized in Table . In addition, surface tension is neglected to avoid its influence on stress stability and maintain consistency with references .…”
Section: Numerical Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Cabezon et al 2012;Jiang et al 2014). We will assess the accuracy of the integral-based gradient estimates under idealized conditions in Sec.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The free surface problems that abound in many industrial production processes, including CIM and GAIM, are usually addressed with interface tracking methods such as smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH), phase field, volume of fluid (VOF), level set (LS), and CLSVOF (coupled level set and volume of fluid) methods . Among these methods, the CLSVOF method combines the advantages of the LS and VOF methods and compensates for the disadvantages of individual methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%