2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/413275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Numerical Analysis of Transmission Tower-Line System Wind-Induced Collapsed Performance

Abstract: The numerical simulation of transmission tower-line systems' progressive collapse performance is considered as a major research hotspot and significant project, due to the increasing number of wind-induced collapse accidents recently. In this study, the finite element models for single tower and transmission tower-line system were established to simulate wind-induced progressive collapse by birth-to-death element technique in ABAQUS/Explicit. The wind field, based on the Kaimal fluctuating wind power spectrum … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Geometric nonlinearity that accounts for the effect of changes in geometry and accumulated strain on the structural stiffness of elements (Hrinda, 2006) • Material nonlinearity that accounts for permanent (or plastic) deformation in materials subjected to stresses exceeding their yield point (Souza Neto, et al, 2008) To determine the dynamic response of the towers accurately, wind-induced response of the transmission lines should also be included in the model (Zhang, et al, 2013;Battista, et al, 2003). Although a model with three towers and four spans of transmission lines is the optimal configuration for analysis (Zhang, et al, 2013), one tower and two spans of transmission lines can produce reasonably accurate results with enhanced computational efficiency (Li, et al, 2012).…”
Section: Structure Assessment Philosophy and Modelling Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• Geometric nonlinearity that accounts for the effect of changes in geometry and accumulated strain on the structural stiffness of elements (Hrinda, 2006) • Material nonlinearity that accounts for permanent (or plastic) deformation in materials subjected to stresses exceeding their yield point (Souza Neto, et al, 2008) To determine the dynamic response of the towers accurately, wind-induced response of the transmission lines should also be included in the model (Zhang, et al, 2013;Battista, et al, 2003). Although a model with three towers and four spans of transmission lines is the optimal configuration for analysis (Zhang, et al, 2013), one tower and two spans of transmission lines can produce reasonably accurate results with enhanced computational efficiency (Li, et al, 2012).…”
Section: Structure Assessment Philosophy and Modelling Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a model with three towers and four spans of transmission lines is the optimal configuration for analysis (Zhang, et al, 2013), one tower and two spans of transmission lines can produce reasonably accurate results with enhanced computational efficiency (Li, et al, 2012).…”
Section: Structure Assessment Philosophy and Modelling Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…secondary bracings) are considered as truss elements due to their single bolt connections at the end, low flexure stiffness and low moments transferring to other structural members [31,36,37]. Compared with the complexity of the truss modelling method, the truss-beam method simplifies the modelling process on which current numerical research on behaviours of transmission tower structures are based [24,38,39]. Its accuracy has also been proven by comparing with the results from experimental testing [40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Modelling the Individual Members Of Steel Lattice Transmissimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently, a further study on failure behaviours has been undertaken on a numerical model of a steel lattice transmission line system [38]. These authors modelled a line system by connecting tower models with cable elements and tested them in various wind conditions.…”
Section: Dynamic Failure Of Lttsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caused by strong winds or nonuniform icing, conductor galloping is a kind of self-excited vibration with low frequency (0Hz-3Hz) and high amplitude (a few meters to tens of meters), and that can cause various types of damage, such as conductor fracture, tower collapse, and large-scale grid paralysis. Hence, galloping prevention is imperative [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%