DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-70844-5_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Number of Runs in Sturmian Words

Abstract: Abstract. Denote by S the class of standard Sturmian words. It is a class of highly compressible words extensively studied in combinatorics of words, including the well known Fibonacci words. The suffix automata for these words have a very particular structure. This implies a simple characterization (described in the paper by the Structural Lemma) of the periods of runs (maximal repetitions) in Sturmian words. Using this characterization we derive an explicit formula for the number ρ(w) of runs in words w ∈ S,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we have computed the asymptotic limit of the ratio of the number of cubic runs to the length of the word. In contrast to the maximal repetitions ratio (0.8; see [2]) and the distinct squares ratio (0.9; see [3]), in this case the limit is an irrational number:…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, we have computed the asymptotic limit of the ratio of the number of cubic runs to the length of the word. In contrast to the maximal repetitions ratio (0.8; see [2]) and the distinct squares ratio (0.9; see [3]), in this case the limit is an irrational number:…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We reduce the problem of counting large cubic runs to that of counting medium cubic runs, using morphic representation of standard words introduced in Section 3. We use here similar approach as in [2]. Let h be a morphism, let v = a 1 a 2 .…”
Section: Large Runsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The best known result runs(n) 1.029n is due to Crochemore et al [6], but it is conjectured [11] that runs(n) < n. The maximal number of runs was also studied for special types of words and tight bounds were established for Fibonacci words [11,18] and more generally Sturmian words [1]. The combinatorial analysis of runs is strongly related to the problem of estimation of the maximal number of squares in a word.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Example binary words for which the maximal number of cubic runs is attained are shown in the following Table 2. n 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 cubic-runs 2 (n) 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 n 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 cubic-runs 2 (n) 4 [10]. The best known result runs(n) 1.029n is due to Crochemore et al [6], but it is conjectured [11] that runs(n) < n. The maximal number of runs was also studied for special types of words and tight bounds were established for Fibonacci words [11,18] and more generally Sturmian words [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%