2007
DOI: 10.3103/s0027132207030072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The number of independent sets in graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In major breakthroughs a little over five years ago, Conlon and Gowers [21] and independently Schacht [55] proved very general transference results, yielding important corollaries of the KŁR conjecture. Their work was soon followed by another dramatic breakthrough: Balogh, Morris, and Samotij [13] and independently Saxton and Thomason [53], building on work of Kleitman-Winston [39] and of Sapozhenko [51,52] for graphs, developed powerful theories of hypergraph containers.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In major breakthroughs a little over five years ago, Conlon and Gowers [21] and independently Schacht [55] proved very general transference results, yielding important corollaries of the KŁR conjecture. Their work was soon followed by another dramatic breakthrough: Balogh, Morris, and Samotij [13] and independently Saxton and Thomason [53], building on work of Kleitman-Winston [39] and of Sapozhenko [51,52] for graphs, developed powerful theories of hypergraph containers.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As many interesting combinatorial problems can be phrased in terms of independent sets in graphs and hypergraphs, the problem of bounding the number of independent sets is of central interest. For example, see the ICM 2018 survey [4] on the recent breakthroughs on the hypergraph container method of Balogh, Morris, and Samotij [3] and independently Saxton and Thomason [25], which built partly on the earlier work by Sapozhenko [24], a precursor to Theorem 1.1, giving a weaker upper bound for i(G).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proofs of Theorems 1.3 and 1.4 are similar, while that of Theorem 1.5 is related but somewhat trickier. The general approach has its roots in an idea for counting (ordinary) independent sets due to A.A. Sapozhenko [9], [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%