2013
DOI: 10.4171/cmh/281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The number of constant mean curvature isometric immersions of a surface

Abstract: In classical surface theory there are but few known examples of surfaces admitting nontrivial isometric deformations and fewer still non-simplyconnected ones. We consider the isometric deformability question for an immersion x : M → R 3 of an oriented non-simply-connected surface with constant mean curvature H. We prove that the space of all isometric immersions of M with constant mean curvature H is, modulo congruences of R 3 , either finite or a circle (Theorem 1.1). When it is a circle then, for the immersi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, if D ∩ B(ε R) = Ø, then H ≤ C a R . Next, we recall the notion of flux of an H -surface; see for instance [11,12,25] for further discussions of this invariant. The flux of a 1-cycle in an H -surface M is a homological invariant and we say that M has zero flux if the flux of any 1-cycle in M is zero; in particular, since the first homology group of a disk is zero, an H -disk has zero flux.…”
Section: Corollary 26mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, if D ∩ B(ε R) = Ø, then H ≤ C a R . Next, we recall the notion of flux of an H -surface; see for instance [11,12,25] for further discussions of this invariant. The flux of a 1-cycle in an H -surface M is a homological invariant and we say that M has zero flux if the flux of any 1-cycle in M is zero; in particular, since the first homology group of a disk is zero, an H -disk has zero flux.…”
Section: Corollary 26mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following is essential for the proof of Theorem 5. For its proof we adopt techniques used in [19,49,53]. Proof: (i) We claim that for any σ ∈ D in the group of deck transformations of the universal coverπ :M → M, the surfacesf ± θ :M → Q 4 c in the associated family off = f •π andf ± θ • σ are congruent for any θ ∈ S 1 .…”
Section: The Moduli Space Of Non-simply-connected Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We next describe the notion of flux of an H-surface in R 3 , see for instance [6,7,32] for further discussion of this invariant.…”
Section: Thenmentioning
confidence: 99%