2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2017.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Null-Test for peptide identification algorithm in Shotgun proteomics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increasing complexity of the peptide identification pipelines and the advancement in the mass spectrometric instrumentation yield new challenges for maintaining fair FDR estimation, and old approaches may fail to reveal bias in modern methods. For instance, the null test and the decoy–decoy search approaches are ineffective at pinpointing the bias we showed in this Letter because these methods do not utilize the target peptide set (see Supplementary Note S1.2), and thus they do not consider the differences between the distribution of or the correlation between the theoretical spectra of the target and decoy peptides. Granholm et al proposed a so-called semilabeled method to demonstrate biased features in Percolator using so-called entrapment sequences .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing complexity of the peptide identification pipelines and the advancement in the mass spectrometric instrumentation yield new challenges for maintaining fair FDR estimation, and old approaches may fail to reveal bias in modern methods. For instance, the null test and the decoy–decoy search approaches are ineffective at pinpointing the bias we showed in this Letter because these methods do not utilize the target peptide set (see Supplementary Note S1.2), and thus they do not consider the differences between the distribution of or the correlation between the theoretical spectra of the target and decoy peptides. Granholm et al proposed a so-called semilabeled method to demonstrate biased features in Percolator using so-called entrapment sequences .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most importantly, some tools could overfit and report a list of results that, even though satisfying a given FDR, were still not trustworthy 6 . SEPro was benchmarked using a semi-labeled decoy approach to ensure the trustworthiness of its results and was later certified by other groups 19 . A new protocol was published 20 reflecting the changes that led to PatternLab 3.…”
Section: Development Of the Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, peptide identifications are assessed by searching datasets of scrambled sequences or including unlabeled decoy sequences and quantitation extraction can be evaluated on datasets generated with spiked proteins of known amounts. Zhang and collaborators compared the trustworthiness of search engine identifications and reported PatternLab as the only algorithm to identify no decoy proteins when searching datasets containing only decoys 19 .…”
Section: Plv Provides Confident Identificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%