2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11138-018-0414-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nudge wars: A modern socialist calculation debate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If individuals remain free to deviate from the default option, they argue, the libertarian should not be bothered by this paternalistic form of coercive state intervention in the economic system. In contrast, the imputation policies that influence coercive judicial orders (e.g., regulations or taxes) are called hard or socialist paternalism [53,54]. If socialist paternalists consider that the poor often produce suboptimal outcomes by the political decision-makers criteria, coercive state intervention must "help" the poor make their decisions to reduce systematic cognitive biases in the way they think.…”
Section: The Nudge Theory: the Behavioral Development Economics Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If individuals remain free to deviate from the default option, they argue, the libertarian should not be bothered by this paternalistic form of coercive state intervention in the economic system. In contrast, the imputation policies that influence coercive judicial orders (e.g., regulations or taxes) are called hard or socialist paternalism [53,54]. If socialist paternalists consider that the poor often produce suboptimal outcomes by the political decision-makers criteria, coercive state intervention must "help" the poor make their decisions to reduce systematic cognitive biases in the way they think.…”
Section: The Nudge Theory: the Behavioral Development Economics Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A planner with a powerful enough computer could not solve it—although Lange thought this was the case (cf. Devereaux, 2019, p. 148).…”
Section: Polycentric Economic Planning: Ecological Rationalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While modern economists mostly agree that the dispersed and proprietary knowledge of individuals is decisive for economic decision‐making, some suggest that “it is incorrect, or at least, outdated, to claim that designers of regulations cannot improve upon market outcomes, given current and conceivable computing methods” (Devereaux, 2019, p. 141). Following the Cybersyn experience, advances in computational and machine learning methods in big data could feasibly design an institutional constraint that overcomes the economic calculation challenge revealed by Mises and Hayek (Bowles, Kirman, & Sethi, 2017).…”
Section: Algorithmic Planning In Chilementioning
confidence: 99%