1951
DOI: 10.1088/0370-1298/64/3/302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nuclear Surface Energy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(J) where the total energy E of the nucleus is a function of the mass number A, the Fermi momentum kf, and the surface area S. This definition is practically in accordance with the definition given by Swiatecld and other authors [3,6,7,9] …”
supporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(J) where the total energy E of the nucleus is a function of the mass number A, the Fermi momentum kf, and the surface area S. This definition is practically in accordance with the definition given by Swiatecld and other authors [3,6,7,9] …”
supporting
confidence: 69%
“…where the total energy E of the nucleus is a function of the mass number A, the Fermi momentum kf, and the surface area S. This definition is practically in accordance with the definition given by Swiatecld and other authors [3,6,7,9] but differs from that one used by Hill and Wbeeler [4], Guruits et al [8] and Lanzi [5] which we believe to be inappropriate to nuclear physics. (Furthermore, the method of LanzI is entirely wrong so that with definition (1) he would get u = 0.)…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then one has to write Eqs. (10) (12) Let us define a function w(r) such that the portion of the box that is in the shell between rand r + dr is given by w(r) dr. Then the correction may be written as…”
Section: Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider here the linear potential model [9,10] approximation to the effective potential at a metal surface (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%