2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2021.122278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nuclear ground-state properties and stellar electron emission rates of 76Fe, 78Ni, 80Zn, 126Ru, 128Pd and 130Cd using RMF and pn-QRPA models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In figure 2, we show the comparisons of the semi-empirical (F 1 , F 2 , F 3 , F 4 ) and macro-microscopic (FRDM +QRPA) [35] calculations to the estimations using self-consistent models (Gross theory + Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov (GT-HFB) [66,67], density functional continuum quasiparticle random phase approximation (DF-CQRPA) [67][68][69], proton-neutron relativistic quasiparticle random phase approximation (pnRQRPA) [70], large scale shell model (LSSM) [71,72], shell model (SM) [72,73], proton-neutron relativistic quasiparticle timeblocking approximation (pnRQTBA) [70], and finite Fermi system theory (FFST) [74]), where available, for the 66−76 Fe (panel A), 68−78 Ni (panel B), and 119−127 Rh (panel C) isotopes. It was found that the difference between the semi-empirical calculations and self-consistent-model estimations is small, which is from a few factors to one order of magnitude, except for the pnRQRPA model.…”
Section: 139mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In figure 2, we show the comparisons of the semi-empirical (F 1 , F 2 , F 3 , F 4 ) and macro-microscopic (FRDM +QRPA) [35] calculations to the estimations using self-consistent models (Gross theory + Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov (GT-HFB) [66,67], density functional continuum quasiparticle random phase approximation (DF-CQRPA) [67][68][69], proton-neutron relativistic quasiparticle random phase approximation (pnRQRPA) [70], large scale shell model (LSSM) [71,72], shell model (SM) [72,73], proton-neutron relativistic quasiparticle timeblocking approximation (pnRQTBA) [70], and finite Fermi system theory (FFST) [74]), where available, for the 66−76 Fe (panel A), 68−78 Ni (panel B), and 119−127 Rh (panel C) isotopes. It was found that the difference between the semi-empirical calculations and self-consistent-model estimations is small, which is from a few factors to one order of magnitude, except for the pnRQRPA model.…”
Section: 139mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed peaks in the abundance pattern of r-process elements arise due to the deceleration of matter flow at these WPs. Thus, matter assembles at the WP, and nuclei undergo a series of BDs before the r-process recommences [2,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The high temperature (> 1 GK) and high neutron density (> 10 20 g/cm 3 ) conditions associated with the neutron-star to neutron-star collisions [17] and core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) [11] establish a site for creating the r-process elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards, this model has been implemented by Nabi et al [25] for weak rates calculations of neutron-rich isotopes of several elements having A 100. In his recent publications, Nabi et al presented β-decay half-lives, GT strength distributions, phase space and stellar weak rates of waiting point nuclei having N = 50, 82 [26,27] and N = 126 [28] by employing the deformed p-n-QRPA model. The β-decay properties of even-even chromium isotopes were earlier studied using the same model [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%